Here's a question. Like everyone else on here I've bought a few knives in my time, and there some obvious limitations to some of them. For example, its good to have a SAK as a general tool but you wouldnt expect it to do much serious cutting, and as a soldier many years ago we had a running SAK/Leatherman debate (answer: Leatherman for work, SAK on the car keys in case a bottle of wine hove onto the scene). But, just how much better does a knife have to be to justify 350 quid? What does it do that my Swedish Army Frosts Mora and/or my 4" Gerber wont? What does it do that the other competition wont? What else could you do with the 250 quid or so that you can save by simply buying the "next best" knife?