I have no idea whether we have anti-gravity Corso, just reporting my experience and that it was an eyeopener at the time that made me look outside of the box as it were.
That said, the Amerkins didn't develop Nukes using a private company as such and yet the technology also got passed to us (not the highest bidder), the Ruskies too I gather! The Israelis are pretty much accepted as having enough nukes to turn the Middle East into a glass parking lot if push came to shove into the sea. It has been more than just M16s and General Electric TVs shipping to Tele Aviv! Remember the film 'The Sum of All Fears'? The US struck with one of its own exported nukes if I remember rightly, interesting premise.
Remember the Russians claimed they were only lagging behind the Yanks and Brits because their Nazi Scientists weren't as good as our Nazi Scientists, Operation Paperclip and all that? It may have also had something to do with Communism of course.
If the US and UK do have AG then they won't be needing an extra runway at Heathrow and we'd be getting thrown off with stories of little green/grey men and the promise of 'Disclosure' about all that intimate probing that is talked about.
It would make a mockery of AGW as well because I'm sure they wouldn't run on Bio-diesel, something a little more advanced me thinks!
As I say I don't know if we have AG but I do know that the things below are really old technology and the secret jump in technology will probably be a light year ahead of these. I wonder how all those military satellites and weapon platforms get up into orbit? If this kind of tech. exists then AGW isn't a problem but for the control and economical crippling that policy implementation will bring.
The question is whether we need to release less CO2 or more or neither matters? What we need is advanced technology that has minimal negative consequences.
View attachment 28268View attachment 28269