Interesting. No offence meant to anybody, but i wonder about the merits of actually giving it a definition.
i seem to think that if you define a term, it slips neatly into a box and if you do anything that is not encapsulated by the definition, it's excluded as 'not REAL bushcraft'.
Some people come to the Bushcraft world (or this site) because their interest may be involved in Bushcraft. Wildlife enthusiasts, Naturalists, survivalists, people who follow outdoor pursuits, knife enthusiasts, canoeists, people with an interest in ecology and 'greener living', crafts people, history buff's, people who just have a thirst for knowledge or who have simply seen something on TV, the internet or read an article in a magazine or book.
Because all these things and more intertwine and mingle (just look at the thread topic's for diversity) then people stumble into (and out of) the Bushcraft world frequently.
The only issue i have with giving it a definition is, if the definition becomes inclusive, it automatically becomes exclusive and this site in particular and it's members and contributers are the most understanding and varied that it has ever been my privalige to converse with and not exclusive by any stretch. This is why i feel so many people come here, everybody will bend over backwards to help people with a question they have, newbie or 'old hand'!
Don't try to define it, try to enjoy it!