nobby said:
Other than the SAK do any of these have an edge?
We use a 'Viking' - Bjarni of the Longship trading Company - to teach the children and he brings a lot of weapons, but none of them have an edge. They are facsimiles of swords, spears and axes incapable of causing harm except as bludgeons. If they had edges he wouldn't be in our school, or any other.
I can't believe that the police would have a problem with that.
Most of my weapons are indeed blunted for safety but not as blunt as the typical blades used by other presenters like Bjarni. It sounds like he is using the type of blades that are made for use in re-enactment battles. Such equipment is readily available but tends to resemble iron bars rather than real swords.
The problem with such re-enactment blades are they are much heavier than real blades ever were which leads to a completely false impression of the weapons actually used in the period.
I am a living historian and experimental archaeologist rather than a re-enactor and there is quite a difference.
The blades I use are what are sometimes termed "museum sharp". Indeed I have produced such swords for Museums such as the Roskilde Ship Museum in Denmark and Lofotr in Norway. They are of exactly correct weight and profile but lack the final sharpened edge.
To all intents and purposes they look just as they should do.
The blades sheathed on my belt are real and sharp, as they are used for various jobs during my presentations, but they are never allowed into the hands of pupils.
All my other "replicas" are accurate to the last degree, even having been made in the material and same manner as the original finds. To do anything otherwise would be as bad as taking a horned helmet in to a school.
I have heard many good things about Bjarni's talks, but I should point out that unlike many other presenters, weapons make up a mere ten minutes of my day long presentation. The violent aspects of Vikings are given very little priority compared to their daily life as sailors, farmers, traders and craftsmen.
What time is given to such matters, is mostly aimed at showing what a grisly, horrific matter warfare of that time actually was. This is the approach that has been very much appreciated by many of the teachers in schools that book me year after year and has been positively commented upon by various Ofsted inspectors too.
Im sorry if this post is a little long and off topic but I take what I do very seriously and believe accuracy to be most important. If I tell the children this is how something was done, it is because I have done it myself and know it is correct. In my opinion this can only be achieved with faithful reproductions of their equipment.
I'll climb off my soapbox now......