I guess this means I treat others as I would hope they will treat me, normally, without prejudice or any kind of discrimination. Positive or negative.
What I want is to be allowed to get on with life/work/fun/stuff.
SO why shouldn't we all get that option?
Anyone with any permanent or temporary health issues, mental or physical has the ability to choose how disabling or enabling those issues are.
J
I'm going to bring this back a bit J. I understand what you are saying but you contradict yourself here. I think it helps to speak about this as it puts what I said in a real life context. I said it is "society that disables people". You said "why shouldn't we all get that option?" and that "Anyone...has the ability to choose how disabling or enabling those issues are." TBH that's cxonfusing. I'll tell you why. Some folk do not have the ability to communicate/travel or be independent. They in most cases do not have the opportunities that many of us take for granted (from buses to trains to buildings etc)as you correctly identified by recognising this however, this is not down to an individuals perception on whether they have an "impairment", or whatever "label" you use to describe it (because societies need labels, they need descriptions for example in the DDAct). It is society that is you, me and everyone else in it that disables people. Why? Because we do not make an effort to make it INCLUSIVE enough for everyone, regardless of their ability. That's the problem. Regardless of anyones ability they should have equality of opportunity and frankly that does not happen. Debates like this I find are invaluable to see various views and persepctives. I recently finished working for one of the uk's leading charities working on breaking down the barriers to inclusion within society and that's the view they and many other leading think tanks take on it.
Last edited: