Climate Change & Survival.
- Thread starter Le Loup
- Start date
That peer review isn't allowed unless you 100% agree with the political agenda
Who says that is the case? Perhaps you can link to that fallacy, ....sorry...
" fact"?
Thats so far out it's hard to know where to begin.
The whole of climate science suggesting that anthropogenic global warming was regarded as against pretty much every countries ideas of constant fiscal growth.
It's becoming acepted despite pretty much all governments regarding it as a hot potato.
So, I'll ask again. Which part of the science are you struggling with? Maybe someone on here might be able to find you a few links and help you out a bit?
The whole of climate science, good luck with that oxymoron...
I'll say it again, this hasn't been about the science since the 80's
You can take a horse to water.......
Your arguments get weaker and weaker. Still waiting for the proof of your argument from a reputable and unarguably source......
I suppose the cop meetings in Cornwall last year was just a multimillion pound jolly for world leaders, and they had meetings to decide on wording to keep extention rebellion happy.
D
Deleted member 56522
Guest
The next ice age is coming, we're 2000 years over due for it to start. The next ice-age will the vast majority of the earth's population. If global warming were possible in an interglacial, it would have happened every time the planet came out the ice-age.
I bet there were people at the time of Noah telling the world: Don't listen to that nutter it's global drying you should be afraid of.
Some horses can’t even be taken to water!You can take a horse to water.......
Your arguments get weaker and weaker. Still waiting for the proof of your argument from a reputable and unarguably source......
I suppose the cop meetings in Cornwall last year was just a multimillion pound jolly for world leaders, and they had meetings to decide on wording to keep extention rebellion happy.
Who says that is the case? Perhaps you can link to that fallacy, ....sorry...
" fact"?
Sorry, couldn't resist - that is a joke!
Actually unicorns are mentioned in the bible about nine times.. don’t ask me for chapter and verse!Who says that is the case? Perhaps you can link to that fallacy, ....sorry...
" fact"?
Sorry, couldn't resist - that is a joke!
But... it only came into being as a descriptive word when the king James Bible was translated from Latin into English. The English translation of a single horned creature the size of a horse is origionaly thought to be some sort of now extinct aurox .
I'm still looking for unicorn horns myself to prove they are /were real.
I believe in unicorns!!!!!!!!! Nobody gonna tell me they don't exist, as they have been mentioned in the ultimate truth of the Bible!!!
(Sorry, don't mean to offend any devout Christians that might be lurking here. Just trying to prove that anything can be proved as long as you have a "reputable"source)
Also proving one needs to look a little deeper than face value at any information presented in such a source.
Last edited:
I'm beginning to worry about the adverse effect the hot air on this thread may be having on the climate!
I'm not here to argue with anyone, a member here chucked a load of pointless links up to cause drama and I replied against them, big deal.You can take a horse to water.......
Your arguments get weaker and weaker. Still waiting for the proof of your argument from a reputable and unarguably source......
I suppose the cop meetings in Cornwall last year was just a multimillion pound jolly for world leaders, and they had meetings to decide on wording to keep extention rebellion happy.
Not a shread of real evidence was delivered, just alot of media driven hysteria
The worlds been dying since the bible.
COP what did they fix? - nothing but plenty of underhanded deals were done though...
Thanks for that
Maybe they read up on the subject and realise the media drama has blown it all out of proportion, so much so they were happy to be on the front line during the pandemic caring for covid positive patient's? just maybe?
I won't works of fiction have no place in science
I'm off now, minds arn't for changing, controlling maybe but not changing...
There are unicorns; they're all over the place up here. It's the National animal
It's carved on everything from gateways to castles. Has been so for hundreds of years.
I think the biggest issues are that folks have conflated so many differing strands of 'evidence' and when it is looked at, with thought, rather than just glanced through and spouted onwards, then the evidence presented in support often doesn't actually apply to the topic.
That muddle becomes both annoying and frustrating, and we end up with folks ranting and raving against anyone who says, "Well, wait a minute, this isn't actually relevant", and, "How much did you get paid to write this ?".
We need encouragement to change things, not harangued or browbeaten with ranting great screeds of mixed grade science and tabloid journalism.
The Earth and it's climate are in a constant state of flux. Albeit it's a long time period kind of flux usually.
It was warmer here when the Romans invaded Britain than it is now.
What is now sub marginal land was productive arable land then.
I'm not denying climate change, or mankind's part in it, but change is normal, not just driven by us.
It's how we adapt to those changes that matters, but that change needs society to adapt; in the grand scheme of things a few individuals aren't going to do it, regardless of how careful or conscientious they may be.
So, I won't be becoming a 'crusty' and I won't be giving up living in a warm dry home, even if I am not energy self sufficient, or off grid for water, sewerage, electricity, gas or even cable internet.
My 'society' is trying to change, and slowly we're getting there at least on the green energy front
The rest will just take a bit more time and effort.
Turn down the thermostat a degree or so though, put on another jumper and some socks, it's March, not mid Summer
It's carved on everything from gateways to castles. Has been so for hundreds of years.
I think the biggest issues are that folks have conflated so many differing strands of 'evidence' and when it is looked at, with thought, rather than just glanced through and spouted onwards, then the evidence presented in support often doesn't actually apply to the topic.
That muddle becomes both annoying and frustrating, and we end up with folks ranting and raving against anyone who says, "Well, wait a minute, this isn't actually relevant", and, "How much did you get paid to write this ?".
We need encouragement to change things, not harangued or browbeaten with ranting great screeds of mixed grade science and tabloid journalism.
The Earth and it's climate are in a constant state of flux. Albeit it's a long time period kind of flux usually.
It was warmer here when the Romans invaded Britain than it is now.
What is now sub marginal land was productive arable land then.
I'm not denying climate change, or mankind's part in it, but change is normal, not just driven by us.
It's how we adapt to those changes that matters, but that change needs society to adapt; in the grand scheme of things a few individuals aren't going to do it, regardless of how careful or conscientious they may be.
So, I won't be becoming a 'crusty' and I won't be giving up living in a warm dry home, even if I am not energy self sufficient, or off grid for water, sewerage, electricity, gas or even cable internet.
My 'society' is trying to change, and slowly we're getting there at least on the green energy front
The rest will just take a bit more time and effort.
Turn down the thermostat a degree or so though, put on another jumper and some socks, it's March, not mid Summer
Point 1. By replying to negate it, you are arguing
Point 2. You have not produced any proof of your opinion, but rubbish others opinions.
Point 3. A pointless point.
Point 4. Were you there, taking part to be able to make such a definite statement? If not you are not realy any more in the know than any other member of the public are you.?
