Realistically do we carry only the smallest, lightest and fewest items that you might need, or do you carry a regular load as a habit and learn to cope with the added volume and weight?
just a thought
just a thought
leon-1 said:From a pesonal point of view I tend to carry a regular load, it is safer in the long run and means that if the situation should change then I am prepared for it
ChrisKavanaugh said:.... I am forever fascinated by Oetzi. I recently updated his kit...
A very practical way of looking at it, he *had* to use his equipment effectively, and not just for a few days out in the oolou. Thing is though, he may have been found alone, but he would not have existed alone, his society would have been an important resource in itself. As is ours.
Toddy
Yeah, and he was killed by an arrow in the back, severing a brachial artery... if I remember correctly.ChrisKavanaugh said:A recent program looked at Oetzi through the eyes of a forensic police officer - perhaps the oldest 'cold case' file to date. It would appear Oetzi killed two of his protagonists and carried a companion some distance according to the blood splatters on his arrows, knife and backpack. This saddened me somehow. His home village probably held at best 40-60 people. For people to allready be in conflict over resources, game, his copper axe or other issues lost in time saddens me. In one of my archaeology classes we had to write a paper choosing which era, culture we would like to have been part of. I chose the upper paleolithic reindeer hunters of western europe. It would have been something watching those animals being painted at Lascaux etc.