(...)
Are you sitting comfortably?
then we'll begin
6 years ago at one of our group meetings it was decided that we should try a little experiment.
ie to capture a night visitor on camera camcorder.
we drew lots to see who should do this bit.
low and behold I won or lost!!
my camcorder was set up in night vision mode with two infra red illuminators pointing at me whilst I slept on my sofa.
during the night something strange was caught on tape.
to go into the full details would take ages but what it was was a ball of light or something passing slowly over me from feet to head as it passed over me it lit my timex indiglo watch. wich was on the table at the side of me.
intrigued by this we sent the video to the un named university.
the report was staggering and its framed now in my living room on the wall!!
it stated that the object was moving not being blown or such.
that the object was 2.35. feet from the camera lens at its closest point to camera and that it was a little larger than a tennis ball!!
it had to be emmiting a high emp of some type yet unexplainable to have lit the watch as it passed by.
they could not identify the nature or origin of the said object. only that its path was deliberate.
they also said that. not to be quoted as saying under intelligent control
but it was in some way deliberate and controlled movement..
the only other explanation was a firelfy but when are we going to find a firefly in wakefield in october or at any other time??
the photographic expert at the uni said there was no sign in any way of film tampering, or image manipulation of any kind!!
and if it was a hoaks then it would put spielberg to shame, it would have cost thousand of pounds to produce.!!
I have had the abduction experience on more than one occasion in my life. and have had all the tests ie temperal lobe epilepsy the job lot and am perfectly clear of all
this is not haox or imagination it is fact!!!
hope this helps
BF
First:
I wouldnt call the erratic movements of a firefly neither deliberate nor controlled...
Secondly:
The sigthing you describe could be completely explained by some kind of ball lightning, which in itself is quite rare.
Thirdly:
It would seem to me that quite many people - from various cultures and languages - expirience some unexplained sightnings from time to time. This might in itself be scientifically interesting.
At the same time it could prove to be problematic (at least in terms of research funding allocation) to properly research such areas as long as the predominantly explanations involves intelligent lifeforms from other planets.
There are quite many - completely natural - phenomenon which is only quite vaguely explained in terms of scientifical knowledge.
Especially the observed connection between ionized plasma-clouds in the outer atmosphere and seismic events may account for great many of these sigthnings - and could - if researched futher - potentially be used to established quite accurate early-warning systems for earthquakes.
The "sprites" (lightning which shoots upwards into the outer atmosphere) is equally poorly understood. A further understanding of such phenomenons might prove useful in establishing a scientific basis for explanation of many of such sigthnings.
In science and philosophy there is a non-formal "rule" called Ockhams Razor, which in its original form states: "entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem".
Newton explained the same rationale with his saying: "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes."
And while neither Newtons or Ockhams "razor" are distinctlively scientific results, it nevertheless gives a quite usefull rationale for dealing with such unexplained observations.
One such try to research and explain such sightnings and phenomenon with established and scientifically sound knowledge. First when all possibilities of explanation using present knowledge is proved futile should explanations involving exterterrestial lifeforms (or similar entities) be considered.
I have no proof that exterterrestial lifeforms never have visited the planet (Indeed, som biologists remain convinced that the radiation resistance of the Deinococcus radiodurans bacteria proved that it has undergone evolution in deep space). Yet it would seem to me that most of the published sigtnings and observations could actually be explained using no more than already established scientifical knowledge.
Have you considered submitting the captured video material for scientific research in ball lightning. The video footage might proved usefull - especially it it truly is photographed in infrared spectrum.
//Kim Horsevad
