Dan,
There are quite a lot of posts now on this forum, British Blades, Blade Forums and Spyderco's own forum covering the things you raise in your posts.
You are not the first to voice disappointment that Spyderco have not been "dynamic and innovative", but it has already been pointed out that
A) If this is successful there is the intention to make a flat ground S90V version with carbon handles,
and
B) Just how to you define dynamic innovation? Spyderco make a lot of knives in VG10, S30V and H1 with synthetic handles, using wood and O-1 is a big departure for them, whereas VG10 and Micarta or G10 would be sort of ho-hum normal. If you can find another company of similar size and standing who is offering knives in O-1, please can you let me know. I have thought it a fairly rare thing and if I am in error I would like to know.
Be fair to Spyderco, they did not jump on this so called bandwagon without a lot of outside persuasion. It was UK Ken who first asked them to look at making such a knife in the first place. Anyway, if the product is good, what is the problem? If it cost more than you wanted, don’t buy it, you will be no worse off than if they hadn’t tried, if it’s affordable to you, as a consumer you have more choice with no personal cost. Is it worse that Spyderco try to make a knife for the bushcraft market than it is for them to make money from the military, police, fire service, hikers, hunters, fishermen, divers, martial artists, competitive cutters and knife collectors?
MSRP was announced and discussed at great length a couple of months ago. But that was in Dollars and we will have to wait and see what it finally retails for in the UK.
Spyderco could have set out to design a knife from their own research and completely off their own bat. Most likely, if that had been the case, we would all still be waiting and it might never have happened. If it had happened, the resulting knife would have undoubtedly looked more like what most folk think of as a Spyderco and would probably have shown a lot more US influence. Would it have had a single bevel? It certainly would have been a thicker bevel, probably thicker stock. There would have been less width sculpting in the handle. If it had been made in the US it would probably have been S30V, innovative, but a pain to sharpen if done as a single bevel, however you need to remember that Spyderco have no spare US capacity, nor any in Japan. The end result would probably have sold fine in the US and to knife enthusiast here, which might be the main market anyway, but it was hoped that this design would appeal to a slightly wider group. Outdoors enthusiast who are not steel junkies, who typically don't like Spyderco because they think their knives are ugly and too tactical, and who wanted a comfortable full tang scandi, of guaranteed quality, to take into the woods and use. It wasn't meant to look like a Spyderco Bushcraft Knife, just a bushcraft knife.