Thankyou for the reply chris and for tying up afew loose ends i had in my head. one thing that puzzles me a little still though is that why would people campaign for spyderco to create a knife of such similar design and specs to the majority of all other "bushcraft" knives, when there are so many other options available that are all so similar? why would you pay (for instance) £200 for a mass produced knife when you could get your own custom knife made to your own specs for the same price? other than for the sake of owning a "spyderco bushie?"
I am a spyderco fan and this is in no way an assault on them as a brand and i also own a few different "bushcraft knives" i just wonder if these knives are going to be aimed at the "user" and offered in sufficient numbers at suitable price or whether they will be simply become a "collector" knife and become the next woodlore?
I have not meant to offend anybody involved with this project and would greatly like to see it become a success and beneficial to everbody!
Dan
I think your assumption that the intended market is directed at the knife nut rather than a more diverse market might be a tad unfair.
I think Spyderco was shooting for a market which includes anyone who may be an outdoors person who needs a trustworthy bush tool/knife and who may not have the experience necessary to obtain one with quality hopefully surpassing the average United Cutlery piece of crap. I personally believe that's their intent in a nutshell.
The future product introduction, which is dependent upon this knives success, might well be considered for the rest of us who are looking for a "premium grade" alternative (hmmm, the average scandi or woody is rarely seen clad in CF scales and with 90V steel that only the most experienced of us might have the remotest chance in hell of sharpening with anything but diamond stones, hones or steels). OK, rant over.