I guess you will also side with her 'if you are on the back foot you had something to hide'.
No, not really. I think you probably put her on the back foot with your response as well.
I guess you will also side with her 'if you are on the back foot you had something to hide'.
I'm a Scot. That matters because it seems we don't see things like the rest of the country does.
Yet we get inundated with cash rich incomers who think that they now "OWN" their land and all that happens upon it.
Not here.
It has never been an offence to be somewhere just for a walk....if you cause no damage, don't intrude on the curtiledge of a demense or disturb farm animals.
One such incomer a bit up the river from us was so incensed that folks could use the river footpath "THROUGH HIS LAND!!!", that he cut down 300 year old oak trees to spoil their view. He was further incensed when he was charged with destoying them but utterly unrepentant that he'd done so for the reason stated.
Most folks would prefer to know those who wander through their land though; that's fair enough. Be civil, say hello, see if there's anything you might do to help ? Peace for all of us.
Hippy friends live in a commune away up the valley; they welcome everyone.
They only get annoyed when a crowd of teenagers who just wanted to drive some place have a big fire and a complete wee up and leave their trash, decided to use their field for it.
I can't blame them; that kind of behaviour just is not acceptable for anyone. Their parents ought to be black affronted that their kids behaved like that.
I know a earl whose family owns an enormous amount of land. He too welcomes people who don't abuse things, happily chatted away to folks. It's healthy. It crosses all boundaries of 'class' or dress (the earl's cashmere cardigans are more patched than a school teacher's tweed jacket )
Dress for the weather, the site, and who cares ?
Quiet rant over
M