I didn't express myself very well, I meant to say there is a distance between the animal you reared and the food.
Not quite sure where you got battery farms from, the people I know abhor them (that's why they raise their own animals). They none of them raise their stock in battery farms, I know cos I've been to several of their smallholdings.
I think it was me that didn't Mike
I hear your point on "don't name your food". I too know some smallholders who do that - and many who name them, then eat them quite happily. Naming is a means of differentiation no different from numbering - and you do need to be able to pick out that Gertrude (or No.27) needs vets attention, is off lay, is broody etc. Indeed for legal reasons most "stock" has to be uniquely identified via tag etc. So the only difference between a name and a number is the persons own emotional response to it - both just tell one from the other. I have no problem with either approach but I do have a problem with the notion of denial. In truth it should be no harder to eat "Gertrude" than "27" - either way the animal deserves compassion and a decent life free of unnecessary suffering until the point of its death comes. And its death and ultimate consumption IS the point of its life. Thats why it was brought into being. If its hard to name..why is it? Is it harder to rear Gertrude..or kill Gertrude rather than "27"? The animal doesn't care what its called. Once you get past accepting that that animal was bred and raised for the specific purpose of being killed and eaten and that without the fact of its being killed and eaten, then it would never have had any life at all then I don't personally find its name matters. Would Gertrude prefer a nice life, with fresh straw, good care, plenty of food, room to roam and things to maintain interest? Or no life because someone doesn't eat meat? I suspect in reality Gertrude doesn't know
But if I am going to eat Gertrude, it pleases me not to have her suffer.
My point about battery farms is that I suspect that the very parents (in the original link) having a whitter about one animal being named, raised and consumed have probably never even considered these facts. They prefer to look at "pretty lambs" without considering their purpose. They probably never consider the inside of those long sheds with sticky out bits in the country. It is this very lack of consideration of the facts of the lives and deaths of the creatures that they consume which leads to an outcry about a single lamb simply because their children met it and named it. Why are they not as bothered about all the creatures their children haven't met and haven't named? Because they choose to deny the reality of the reason farm animals exist - to themselves and their kids. Then they get all upset when they confront that reality because they choose to hide away from it. Education is about learning truth - not perpetuating delusions. Good on the school and if the name brought home to the kids that a single, individual, sentient creature was killed and eaten, its a good thing.
Off for a nice slice of Gertrude now