I know that a lot of the research was on the timing of the decay as well as the evidences left, and on the differences it made if the body were clothed, unclothed, shallow buried, deep buried, etc.,
It can be quite fascinating.
@TeeDee, well, yes and no. That
stuff was once animated humanity with all the emotions attached thereto.
I love and am loved, I don't think I could handle with any serenity seeing my husband or my sons corpses be treated with anything but carefulness. I don't think they could with me either.
Sorry, I don't quite know how to make myself any clearer. As I said, it's an emotional thing.
From an archaeology background I know that for as long as humanity has considered itself to be 'people', and whether that people be HSS or HSN, they buried their dead with care.
Red lady of Paviland is an example from long before even farming reached these shores. Upper Palaeolithic, c33,000 years ago, iirc.
It appears that often the bones of the previous generations were used as a kind of validation for ownership of land, of belonging. Tomb of the eagles, perhaps.
In Catal Huyuk they buried their dead beneath their floors and lived above them. Their houses rose slowly layer by layer on the debris of past generations to create Tells.
We don't seem to have done that here. We have neolithic cremations here where the bones were placed in large urns and buried. Cairns, barrows and the like are commonplace enough across these isles too. 5,000 years ago one was established at Forteviot for instance.
It's the only certainty in life; that we die. The surprising thing is that for the untold millions of people born who lived, there are remarkably few remains left.
M