I bought an 80's quartz omega seamaster off a mate for £350 which he had from new, it is accurate to 10 seconds/ month (which is the same as his new rolex auto loses every day) uses a battery every 3-4 years and dosnt need serviceing every year.
It's horses for courses but in my experience mechanical watches require servicing that is much more expensive than batteries and have moving parts that wear out. Quartz watches often don't. If you have a solar watch you never need to change the battery and as others have said Quartz watches can last for decades. I have a fair few watches of both types and my wife seems to have one for each day of the year. The most reliable, accurate and functional are quartz. The one on my wrist most often has been there for over 8 years without missing a beat. I wore one of the original swatches from the age of 18 most days for over 10 years before selling it off my wrist, to a jeweller who I had asked to change the battery, for over 10 times what I paid for it and he threw in a new swatch that I think I still have in a drawer.If you really believe that a quartz watch is more reliable that a mechanical one then good for you. It's true that they are more accurate but I have never had one that has got me past the five year mark. And I cant recall any quartz watch I ever bought giving more than a 12 month warranty. My mechanical Seiko divers watch has a 25 year professional use guarantee, a bargain for 400 notes. Lets put that against the Quartz Tag Heuer Super Professional 1000m Diver watch. It costs £1280 and only has a 12 month "reasonable use" warranty. If manufacturers wont stand by their quartz watches, why should I ???
PS try finding a replacement battery and seals in the wilderness should the need ever arise!
It's horses for courses but in my experience mechanical watches require servicing that is much more expensive than batteries and have moving parts that wear out. Quartz watches often don't. If you have a solar watch you never need to change the battery and as others have said Quartz watches can last for decades. I have a fair few watches of both types and my wife seems to have one for each day of the year. The most reliable, accurate and functional are quartz. The one on my wrist most often has been there for over 8 years without missing a beat. I wore one of the original swatches from the age of 18 most days for over 10 years before selling it off my wrist, to a jeweller who I had asked to change the battery, for over 10 times what I paid for it and he threw in a new swatch that I think I still have in a drawer.
On the other hand (or wrist) I have a Rolex Explorer that is definitely over 25 years old but, despite being serviced as recommended, has had a couple of problems as has some of the more recent ones including two of my wives. My most recent Submariner only came with a 2 year warranty same as my Casio despite costing 50 times as much and is no where near as accurate. There are other reasons to get them and the engineering is amazing but strict utility is not one of them. Clearly your experience is different but one swallow doesn't make a summer.
How many ! :yikes:
Traser ......love it , sadly it wasn't sealed right after its last battery change . Keep meaning to send it for a service but I can't bear the thought of sending it off
Sent from my HTC Explorer using Tapatalk 2
I know a place that will sorry that out.... The owner has a strange habit of hiding from bearded baldies...
touched by nature
Ooh yes. If ever I buy a new watch, it'll probably be one of those - if I can justify the cost. Which movement does yours have?