Out of curiosity, do you have a source for that? Most tellings I've read and heard consider it to be an arrow or spear of Mistletoe, .............
Nonetheless I would be interested in hearing a different take if there's one that cites Rowan as the one that killed Baldr
Pete
No idea where I heard it, it's been around forever.
Just that the Rowan was truly innocent and could not be magicked into any spell, like the one that protected Baldur. So Loki, knowing every spell must have a way to end it, a get out clause if you will, cut the arrow from it, and gave it to the blind brother, since Baldur was so loved that no other would try to wound him. The blind brother fired true though and the Rowan killed Baldur and didn't just wound him.
Wonder if Wayland might know where this one comes from ?
Mistletoe wasn't even mentioned in this tale Misteltoe is a fertility herb, a magical blessing for health and fecundity. Kissing under it was supposed to bring good luck and healthy offspring. It's been seen as a remedy for poisoning since before the Greeks came to empire.......how could it poison Baldur ?
cheers,
Toddy
Wikipedia quotes your version though.
The reason that Loki couldn't fire the arrow himself was that Rowan does not thrive in the presence of evil, and it wouldn't fire true for him.
Oh well.....here's hoping Wayland knows more
cheers,
M
Sorry if I sound like I'm being pernickety, as an Odinist of sorts (I don't usually use the term Odinism, people tend to jump to thinking they know what i'm talking about ) my curiosity was genuine and I'm always open to hearing alternative versions; when dealing with stories that were, for who knows how long, passed on through speech and song rather than hard and fast copies, it's refreshing to hear the various tellings
Pete
Either way, I had also heard that cited as the root of kissing under mistletoe; that in an act of reparation, it would be a source of good rather than harm. I believe this started with enemies who meet under the mistletoe not fighting, for a while at least.
Pete
No offence in the least, and I hope none given if the tales are of some real significance to you.
Actually, in the tales I know of Loki is just unlucky, he's a kind of chip on his shoulder type who keeps trying to get the best of others but the results are rarely what he intends.
He only wanted to wound Baldur so he wasn't so beautiful, and using the blind brother meant no one would think to punish him for hitting his brother.
I haven't heard these stories in years. My Grandfather could silence all his grandchildren by just saying, "A long time ago, when the world was young...... " His tales were of Scotland though, it's roots and it's people. I don't even remember if he told this story or not.
cheers,
M
Honour your brother's name, unarmed or blind
Let me aid you in your aim
Don't stay behind, let's maim immortality
And death to our deity
There's no reason to defend, nothing can harm him
Let's say it's just pretend
Extend your arm and bend now this fatal bow
And mark with this mistletoe
You're brother's bane
No offence taken at all, certainly no cause for any in anything you've said
I've always considered Loki a more malicious figure, tricking Hodr into thinking that he was honouring Baldr by joining with the other gods (who were launching a variety of missiles at him to flaunt his invulnerability, essentially). Particularly out of a religious context, though, I can understand a less malicious interpretation. I honestly think that one of the best modern versions of this is the song "Brother's Bane" by Tyr:
Well worth a listen
Speech and song are definitely, IMO, the best way for stories to be shared; my brother in law is the best spinner of yarns I've ever known, and my mother telling me stories was what got me interested in the norse lore in the first place
Goatboy - that does sound absolutely wonderful Good interpretation of the mistletoe too!
Pete
Toddy - that sounds like it would be amazing
Goatboy - Quite right, of course, that many superstitions do have a sensible root. Not all, but that's the nature of humanity, really; common sense isn't as common as you might think I'd say you may be walking on rather thin ice with the religious stuff, but I think that if outrightly religious bits such as those mentioned were excluded (probably would be anyway since it's not superstition ), that could make an interesting thread
Pete
Pete, I m a creature of logic, though I have a strong spiritual side.
I would just like to know what folk believe, and to see the roots if they are available.
Most folk can't pair off beleif and logic but in my head they work. would love to know what folk believe.
GB