I second that!
And I will third it.
Whilst we all wish all of mankind would be responsible and that rules were not necessary. Sadly all evidence points to the contrary.
Even where rights have been extended, Loch Lomond shows what can happen.
There is far higher population density in England.
If we aren't brave enough to protect the land, create wildlife habitats and corridors, and manage it - even if that means excluding people at night or even all the time - then we will have no wildlife left - and no woods to go to.
I would have no problem with the "friends" of this wood camping there and excluding others - if people had to rock up to , for example, half a dozen rubbish picking and clear up days, before camping, then I bet they would indeed be more responsible and "shown the way". A little responsibilty earns a little "right". Seems fair to me - its those that cannot be bothered to invest any effort in managing the land that are most prone to trash it.
Red