Agreed. If I dramatically changed the geometry of the knife, it wouldn't be a fair representation of the knife that people would be purchasing.
I would like to really have a try at modifying one to see what could be done with it.
This is the best shot I can manage of the edges.
It's a good shot. That looks a lot like the edge on my felling axe.
It's a good edge for part of a big blade like that (the part you'd use mostly for chopping) but I'd want something a lot finer at the extremes of the blade.
If we can't modify it then I'll pull out of the passaround and let somebody else take a look at it.
Maybe it should be a double passaround. Once as is, then again modified to be more useful. Stick with it though Ged ...
If we modify it to our tastes then the people in the latter half of the list won't be giving the tool a fair test on how everyone will receive it from the manufacturer.
There is a vid on their website showing how to use their sharpening steel on the survival tool. Presumably it would be ok to use that technique on the blade - after all, it's on the video, and it would presumably keep the same profile? Maybe send Chris an email to check that its ok to do that?
I think the problem that Stew has, is not with the edge and keeping it sharp but with the whole profile of that edge, which means a total re-grinding. Something that will need more than a steel to sort out.
the profile is no diferent to a gransfors axe. just a slightly deeper convexed edge, i find it hard to believe that people who claim to know about knives and tools find it so hard to to sharpen a tool that is handed to them, i own a cc tool and i am proud to say that, i use the pin when it needs it, after seeing the videos and looking at the comments i am astounded that nobody has picked up on the fact that the "blunt" chris caine tool only took 32 swings to chop, the competition cutter took 70 swings, you have no need to change the way the tool is ground, you use the pin to hone it to your preferences or just keep it sharp, after all your rules and conditions and i STATE "If you do use the knife hard, please ensure the edge leaves in as good a condition or better than it arrived."
i personally wouldn't reprofile the tool, there is no need to especially if you understand its capabilities, i certainly would not re-profile the blade without not asking chris's permission first
the profile is no diferent to a gransfors axe. just a slightly deeper convexed edge, i find it hard to believe that people who claim to know about knives and tools find it so hard to to sharpen a tool that is handed to them, i own a cc tool and i am proud to say that, i use the pin when it needs it, after seeing the videos and looking at the comments i am astounded that nobody has picked up on the fact that the "blunt" chris caine tool only took 32 swings to chop, the competition cutter took 70 swings, you have no need to change the way the tool is ground, you use the pin to hone it to your preferences or just keep it sharp, after all your rules and conditions and i STATE "If you do use the knife hard, please ensure the edge leaves in as good a condition or better than it arrived."
i personally wouldn't reprofile the tool, there is no need to especially if you understand its capabilities, i certainly would not re-profile the blade without not asking chris's permission first
well put that mate, thats my thought exactly.It might be OK for chopping as is, but the featherstick video obviously showed that it wasn't working at all in this respect. Stew is a knifemaker so sharpening isn't an issue. And if you read his threads properly you will see that the knife IS sharp. There is more to a parang than chopping big stuff down you know. It is also supposed to able to deal with the fine stuff too. The post about it so far are Stews opinion after use so it is early days yet. It may be a different matter for me.
As for it's capabilities and understanding them, that is what this passaround is for. If those capabilities fail to met up to the needs of an experienced parang user, or even excell in them, then obviously they will be reported. That's the beauty of a passaround, we all give unbiased views as we haven't invested in the product.... yet. People who have already invested a large amount of money by buying one are, whether you like it or not, going to be biased towards it.
i know im not in the passaround but if your interested here's a link to my review of 4 survival tools.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiLhkH4o3R4