Just saw the following article on the BBC News about the Loch Lomond ban and the possibilities of that being extended to 5 other lochs.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-14771920
Understandably its the minority that ruin it for the rest. I'm sure if you implement more bans that is just going to push those people further a field and cause issues elsewhere.
How do the likes of Sweden and that cope with people like this where you actually have that freedom to wild camp?
Could this be the start of the end of wild camping?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-14771920
Loch Lomond National Park will use a camping and alcohol ban on east Lomondside as a model to tackle problems around five other lochs. But what difficulties does it face finding the right solution
Understandably its the minority that ruin it for the rest. I'm sure if you implement more bans that is just going to push those people further a field and cause issues elsewhere.
How do the likes of Sweden and that cope with people like this where you actually have that freedom to wild camp?
Could this be the start of the end of wild camping?