Government consultation on banning large knives and machetes

  • Hey Guest, We're having our annual Winter Moot and we'd love you to come. PLEASE LOOK HERE to secure your place and get more information.
    For forum threads CLICK HERE
And UK keep on banning......?
To be honest I've often wondered why some of the high powered, scoped, tactical etc cross bows can be sold in the UK with no restrictions when you need a shotgun licence for something like a single barred .410 or garden gun.

There's also been quite a few crimes where people have used cross bows, including several deaths.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Ystranc and Kadushu
Machete, although it looks more like a modern bill hook.
It is all to do with psychology, perception, and what Saussure called signification. Machete conjures up images of Zombies, lawless Latin Americans and Carribeans whereas the good old Bill Hook, is cry God for Harry, England and St George. Bayonets and Fairbairn Sykes knives which are actual deadly weapons designed to kill however are plastered over with Patriatism and Nostalgia for when we beat those pesky Germans in two World Wars. Machetes and Samurai swords are just too foreign, like Ninjas and Zombies, they do not belong in our sacred shopping Malls which ought to be patrolled by Beefeaters with Halberds to keep us safe from the ungodly unwashed hordes from the Council Estates.
 
I’m guessing -machete

Yup.

In the UK urban environment, the very word "machete" seems to conjure up all sorts of impressions of criminality- heck they didn't just have a knife, they had a machete! :nailbiting:

There seems to be a well established subconscious assumption amongst the UK urban majority that a machete is fundamentally a thing used for committing (violent) crime, it's not really seen as an agricultural tool. And in fairness, in the city that's probably not an unreasonable assumption to make.

The same people don't generally seem to make that link with the word "billhook" I suspect partly because they mostly have no idea what a billhook is, or see it as something historical used in rural areas for agricultural things. Very different subconscious word association.

So describing the Fiskars XA3 as a "machete" was a really daft thing for the on-line retailer to do IMO. I don't know why they suddenly stopped selling them but I can guess they had complaints made. Whereas if they'd called it a "forest billhook" or even "shrub axe" (both of which are much more accurate terms for the item) they perhaps they would still be on sale there (they do still sell axes and splitting mauls).

Words are very powerful and often have very strong subconscious assumptions associated with them. Once these assumptions are established, reasoning or fact rarely manages to change that response.

So, I am always careful how I refer to my tools. For example, I would describe my Skrama 240 as a (full tang) Finnish take on a Knighton pattern or Rodding pattern billhook (well, that's pretty accurate if you put them side by side and take into account 100 years of materials technology between them).

To be honest, crossbows I suspect have a similar word association. Some sort of illicit firearm substitute rather than sporting equipment (whereas the televised Olympics have helped greatly in establishing target archery as a sport in minds of most people).

Yes, as @Laurentius says above, it's all about psychology and perception.

GC
 
It is all to do with psychology, perception, and what Saussure called signification. Machete conjures up images of Zombies, lawless Latin Americans and Carribeans whereas the good old Bill Hook, is cry God for Harry, England and St George. Bayonets and Fairbairn Sykes knives which are actual deadly weapons designed to kill however are plastered over with Patriatism and Nostalgia for when we beat those pesky Germans in two World Wars. Machetes and Samurai swords are just too foreign, like Ninjas and Zombies, they do not belong in our sacred shopping Malls which ought to be patrolled by Beefeaters with Halberds to keep us safe from the ungodly unwashed hordes from the Council Estates.
Hi, first time here, as someone from a Council Estate (or two) - I agree about the psychology. The ban on curved swords came about because the media bigged up supposed "ceremonial swords" and one of the results was that alloy "Samurai" swords designed for traditional sword drawing practice were banned - due to their curved blades - even though their soft metal cannot take an edge, but cheap and gaudy knock-offs with straight blades and sharp edges are still available at the local market! The policy reacted to the "Japaneseness" of the practice blades and not the functionality. It used to be permitted to own such a blunt sword without a licence, but not now. Oddly, one can buy a sharp modern sword - made using traditional methods - more easily than the practice blades. Of course, a martial arts licence helps, but that didn't used to be necessary. FYI I used to practice Kendo and while I am now unable to, due to injuries and disability, I have always wanted to own such a sword. The ban came in just as I was first able to afford to buy one.
 
These blades reach end of life at work then instead of throwing away they get turned into knives for a work process. A handle made of anything to hand and tape, sharpen one or both edges and even put a tip on it if that's what the maker or user needed.

Actually work very well for the use they're put into. They also use other scrap to make knives too. Resourceful indeed. These bodged knives worked better than the kitchen knives they once got bought for the jobs. However one job needs a cheap, shop bought machete. These then get used until the thin part of the blade behind the belly becomes too thin with use and sharpening they get cut down and turned into a short knife for another process.

I find it amazing how the ppl at work need a knife so see the potential in things I simply would not. I think that is one point about how pointless knife control might get. Ppl that want or need knives for illegal use could simply make one out of other stuff. You need to stop the need not the availability since availability is always going to be there.
Too often, the kitchen knives have been shoplifted as a crime of opportunity, which is why some supermarkets stopped selling single knives and only sell knife sets. Most kids aren't going to have the focus to make something, if they did they might not be involved in the kind of situations where knives are likely to be present or used.
 
View attachment 79583

Ban them in cities. Leave the rest of us to get on with using our tools safely and preserving rural skills and culture.
That assumes that no one in the city ever has need for a large knife and people in rural areas always do. I grew up in a house with a single fireplace for heating. Although we burned coal or coke, we used kindling and logs, if we could get them. My first Kukri was as effective as a hand axe (and sharper) and for me as a disabled person, easier to use one-handed on larger logs than a two-handed felling axe or maul. I took my best Kukri when I went camping with a youth camp and used it to gather wood to build the fire and to build our bivvy. Admittedly, I now have central heating, but your response assumes that city people never go into the countryside, never camp, never need a large knife as a working tool. I know it is possible for people coming to the city to rent a bike, will city dwellers going to the wilds be able to rent large tools for their camping needs?
 
Interesting to point out that they are defining blade length as follows:

“(iii)a blade of over 8 inches in length (the length of the blade being the straight-line distance from the top of the handle to the tip of the blade)”

This is contrary to what people have said with regards to pocket knife exemption. For example if this is the interpretation to be made regarding blade length on a more general basis, it would make things like the Boker Plus XS folder illegal to carry as a pocket knife.
The chief coroner had previously defined blade length as the length of the cutting edge but a subsequent court ruling included the ricasso or un sharpened portion of the blade creating a precedent in common law. It’s unlikely that you would be prosecuted for the difference but it could mean the confiscation and destruction of a pocket knife that you had formerly believed to be legal carry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ozmundo
The written wording on pocket knives is
Sections 139 and 139A of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 apply to any article which has a blade or point except a folding pocketknife unless the cutting edge of its blade exceeds 7.62 centimetres (3 inches).
this is what I think would make prosecution unlikely if police measure a pocket knife and include the ricasso. Should give grounds to contest seizure by police.
 
... This ban will only affect the law abiding people and not the criminals who care not for law. ...

The tool will simply change to a hammer, kitchen knife, billhook etc etc. Poverty, lack of opportunity and education is the problem that needs solving.

Right on the money. In fact the last time somebody tried to kill me he used a claw hammer. It didn't turn out too well for him, though. :)
 
Tut tut, as a politician I must say it should be called a war hammer and strictly forbidden. ;):O_O::p

Pole tax the poleaxe. I’m surprised a politician hasn’t found a way to make money of of this?

I wonder if any of them get donations from both zambie kneef manufactures and recycling companies….. hmm ;)
 
Right on the money. In fact the last time somebody tried to kill me he used a claw hammer. It didn't turn out too well for him, though. :)
Cut crystal ashtray for me... And I swear if I'd had my shoes on it would have worked.
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE