Did you never hear of chemical warfare? Swedish fire a deadly weapon in the Viking arsenal.I think I'd quite enjoy seeing two people trying to fight with trangias. I guess you could wear them as helmets?
Did you never hear of chemical warfare? Swedish fire a deadly weapon in the Viking arsenal.I think I'd quite enjoy seeing two people trying to fight with trangias. I guess you could wear them as helmets?
Trangia = environmentally friendly alternative to Molotov cocktail ie. no broken glassI think I'd quite enjoy seeing two people trying to fight with trangias. I guess you could wear them as helmets?
Oh. I see I have yet to master The Way of Bushcraft.Trangia = environmentally friendly alternative to Molotov cocktail ie. no broken glass
Clearly. You have yet to learn to stomp an Esbit stove flat in two seconds, fold it into a star shape using your origami skills and then fling it at your victim's throat like a ninja's shuriken.Oh. I see I have yet to master The Way of Bushcraft.
Now this apparently is partly a question of semantics; "weapon" in legalize means a purpose built thingy and something that is used as. Or so I have been told. Also apparently "offensive" weapons exist but not "defensive" ones, a major lack of logic.
Maybe you have to tell your lawyers to use dictionaries!Mmm.... every dictionary I have looked at includes defence as a use of weapons.
This is strictly not true as an example shows: would you really consider a targe and a sword equivalent both in attack and defense.Something can only be useful for defence if it is capable of offence.
This is strictly not true as an example shows: would you really consider a targe and a sword equivalent both in attack and defense.
Only if you change the meaning between the two weapons.A weapon is a weapon.
I must say that I totally disagree.The targe would be far more dangerous.
No. I've been questioned a few times while traveling to jobs, because a cooks knife case looks like a knife case and not a briefcase. After the second or third interrogation [ because that is what they were] I bought a rigid attache case to keep my chefs tools in. I couldn't carry my steel lockbox because it was too damned big and heavy to move between casual jobs. Stupid laws made by stupid politicians.yes you can use anything as a weapon but it does not become a weapon untill you threaten someone with it.
but that is not true for a knife. any fixed blade knife is illegal to carry without having a genuine reason for having it in your posesion. But that genuine reason is subject to the judgment of others just because you say you have a good reason to carry it does not make it legal.
I was looking for real life examples of people having to justify having bladed articles in their possesion. But I guess the lack of examples must show if you are careful the chances of being questioned are very small
yes you can use anything as a weapon but it does not become a weapon untill you threaten someone with it.
but that is not true for a knife. any fixed blade knife is illegal to carry without having a genuine reason for having it in your posesion. But that genuine reason is subject to the judgment of others just because you say you have a good reason to carry it does not make it legal.
I was looking for real life examples of people having to justify having bladed articles in their possesion. But I guess the lack of examples must show if you are careful the chances of being questioned are very small
Stupid laws indeed.No. I've been questioned a few times while traveling to jobs, because a cooks knife case looks like a knife case and not a briefcase. After the second or third interrogation [ because that is what they were] I bought a rigid attache case to keep my chefs tools in. I couldn't carry my steel lockbox because it was too damned big and heavy to move between casual jobs. Stupid laws made by stupid politicians.