That is an argument.Perhaps not everyone thinks they are bad laws?
Has there been less knife crime since the last time laws were tightened? Why else would a government try to prohibit tools?
That is an argument.Perhaps not everyone thinks they are bad laws?
What if the beforehand is always "you can't"? The concept of "reasonableness" and "Good cause" allows for flexibility of action which would, in the UK, otherwise likely be denied.There seems to be a main difference, here the law is supposed to be written in way that one can decide beforehand what is legal or not, not decide later on by ignorant court.
And interpreted by whom? With what preconceptions and what political agenda. Just think of the judge as "Putin".The concept of "reasonableness" and "Good cause"
By the court and yes, applicable to "the times". That is how policing by consent functions and believe it or not, nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine people out of a million here like it. More or less.And interpreted by whom? With what preconceptions and what political agenda. Just think of the judge as "Putin".
Those are in no way absolutes but very relative to any whim being fashionable at the moment.
Is that the reason you were confined to the islands?nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine people out of a million here like it
Is that the reason you were confined to the islands?