Phew! For a minute there, I thought it might be the new babooning paddles issued to all Mods! :yikes:<snip>
For those who are interested I'm holding up the dagger board and rudder for an Ian Oughtred designed sailing canoe.
I have no reason to doubt that a Moderator's inability to read PMs is fact, and in any case, I'd always give a moderator the benefit of any doubt because it is a thankless task.The comment posted by HillBill stating that Toddy reads PMs was not an opinion. It was an outright lie. Lets stick to the facts here
The consensus is that it's a messHow are you getting on?
Change many in to a disenfranchised minority and I would agree with you. Mainly would-be and wannabe mod, who lacking the respect of their peers or the experience and levelheadedness of a bipartisan independent free thinking person, want their ways to replace the ways of the majority. And get all bent out of shape when their wishes, direction or offers of help are not welcomed with a pathetic gratitude and open arms. Like quite a few people they forget that this forum is not a democracy, we do not have rights, especially not equal rights. We, yes, all of us are merely guests, a welcome guest, but still a guest.For the most part i agree. Too many inconsistencies though for it to be classed as good modding. I would more call it restrictive speech enforcement or opinionated modding.
Not all the time, just on the odd occasion, but still, it is there. It needs working on somewhat. You see a mod has to be unbiased and go with the rules in EVERY situation where modding is required as accorded by the rules. I think that is forgotten at convenient times though with certain people. Which basically means that the rules suit as and when it suits the mods to enforce them.
Many people on this forum already know this of course.