Very, very difficult.
We will know in a couple of decades what a longterm Vegan diet does to the human health.
We will know in a couple of decades what a longterm Vegan diet does to the human health.
The only cruelty that is done is done illegally.
Animal husbandry is highly regulated to be done 'humanely' as much as possible. When people torture animals like that it should result in prosecution.
You can not equal animal torture like that with all husbandry. That is the usual Vegan stand, that ALL husbandry is cruel.
It is not so.
The ethical vegan can tell you a lot of stuff he dreams up or learns through the vegan interest press and publications.
That does not make it true.
Going vegan is detrimental to our bodies, environment.
I wonder what your solution would be (if we all went vegan today) about the many millions of animals, and the millions of people whose job and livelihood is dependent on us eating meat and milk products?
I am sure there must be a plan the Vegan community have designed?
Also the worldwide shipments of food would need to change drastically, many vessels scrapped, many new built.
Nature constructed us to be Omnivorous. Yes, we eat much to much meat. And sadly, meat consumtion is increasing in 'rich' countries.
A small amout of animal protein is very good for us. To much - it is bad for us.
What we should aim for is to eat around 3/4 less animal protein, and increase our intake of the rest.
Pulses, grains, fruit and veg. Preferably grown as close as possible.
Do you know what the biggest nutritional problem is worldwide?
Lack of protein.
What is the easiest way to get affordable protein that is easily absorbed?
Chicken.
Very, very difficult.
We will know in a couple of decades what a longterm Vegan diet does to the human health.
But vegan diets still result in the loss of life, look up harvest mice and combine harvesters for an example.
What about eating snails, I've met vegetarians who use slug pellets to kill snails, surely it is more ethical to eat them?
It does, yeh. But the generally accepted definition of veganism is 'reducing harm and exploitation to animals as much as practically possible'. It's obviously impossible to live in this world without killing small animals and insects when we harvest plants.
What about the habitat loss due to growing crops such as soya? I agree it doesn't make sense to me to feed soya to animals but there's plenty of soya in vegan food and I do wonder if something like a grass fed hill lamb involves less animals being killed to provide the equivalent protein.
Do you have any issue with people eating road kill?
I’d like to pose a question to the vegans out there and it is out of genuine interest rather than just baiting (I fully respect why people would want to lead a vegan lifestyle even if it’s seriously not for me). I’m an arable farmer and in the course of producing a range of cereal crops we have no choice but to have a pest control policy and as a result cull rabbit, pigeon deer etc. My question is as a vegan would you consider eating the meat that inevitably is produced. I’ve asked various vegan friends this question and always get the expected answer that no they wouldn’t but I’ve never had a satisfactory answer as to why it would be better to just dump good meat rather than eat it (to me under those circumstances just saying because I’m against eating meat doesn’t cut it)
we should be also aware of that all domesticated animal species are created by humans. Those will disappear. Cows, horses, chicken, turkeys...
Several fish species.
It would be a different world!
Very, very difficult.
We will know in a couple of decades what a longterm Vegan diet does to the human health.
Hasn’t the southern part of India been fuelled by a vegan diet for a thousand years or so?
Another question might be how healthy are they?I believe they are Lacto Vegetarian