Here is the problem I see with this sort of knife. It is a solution in search of a problem.
If you are intending to go and live in the wilderness, be it Alaska or Austrailia, you will try to pack tools that will do what needs doing efficiently. An axe and saw will be much more efficient in the north woods than a short, heavy knife. In warmer places a long parang/machete type blade starts to come into its own. Couple this with a plain, uncomplicated sheath knife, and you have a pretty good tool set that will help you fashion other tools and to live more comfortably.
If you are going on a camping trip and are carrying a tent or hammock, plus a stove, you probably don't need a big chopper. You certainly don't want the weight. It could be argued that in some places it is foolhardy to go out without at least a last ditch blade. Something stronger than a folder that could cut a splint if needed, or split wood if you desperately need a fire. But a bulky knife over 7" is probably going to get left at home if you are carrying shelter, a stove, etc.
If you are planning to go and make bows, arrows, tan hides, and so forth, all jobs that the Tracker design is meant to help with, what situation are you in? Its not survival. You can fast for a month, and making a bow for hunting is incredibly wasteful of energy. If its survival, what would you be doing scraping hides?
As has been said, its a knife trying to do it all. A combination tool that will do a bunch of jobs, but less well than dedicated tools. I haven't yet worked out when doing all those jobs, less efficiently, would be desireable.