Its a question I have been asked a lot....so here is my latest video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kcN4mzd5Hc
Enjoy.
Neil
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kcN4mzd5Hc
Enjoy.
Neil
Interesting and well done, but would it not be a better solution to buy the larger bag?
There is a reason they designed the LK 70.
Interesting and well done, but would it not be a better solution to buy the larger bag?
There is a reason they designed the LK 70.
With a proper selection, a 35 liter backpack is fine for one week in the nature, providing you can find water.
The 35 was not designed as a day pack. It was designed for the Infantery (mainly) that had the benefit of having most stuff trucked with them, and also had food cooked by a mobile kitchen most of the time.
Unless you really need a large hot drink several times, like you Brits seem to do, you can do day trips with only what you can pack in your jacket and proper trousers. If you can get water.
To carry a backpack on a day trip serms unnecessary.
In UK I used to do day trips an the public footpaths. Nowhere alse I could walk in nature.
Amazing that there seems to be a pub close by everytime the thirst hits you. In South East ( where I walked) at least.
I carried a knife, a map, a pack of Marlborough Ultra, a lighter and a wallet. In the wallet - money, plasters
A sturdy umbrella (=' walking stick with extras')
In Scandinavia I also carry some chocolate and one of two packs of Wasa ready made crackerbread sandwiched.
Water is everywhere and tasty. No pubs.