Royal Wedding Dodging
- Thread starter durulz
- Start date
-
BushMoot: Come along to the amazing Summer Moot 31st July - 5th August (extended Moot : 27th July - 8th August), a festival of bushcrafting and camping in a beautiful woodland PLEASE CLICK HERE for more information.
If It's a nice day weather wise, I've promised to take the Kids to Dalby Forest then up the coast to Whitby to hunt for fossils.
I thought the title said Royal Wedding dogging.
I felt poorly at the thought.
I am planning a night on a beach well away from it all.
I felt poorly at the thought.
I am planning a night on a beach well away from it all.
His Lordship, the most venerable, the most discerning, the most enlightened David Icke.
I have some pipe straight Laburnum that's just dying to be reborn as a longbow, and some wild Rose 2 and 3 year growth to turn into arrow shafts, and some goose feathers, and...
Why are som many people thinking this thread is about royal dogging?? What does that say about people on this thread?? Perverts! 
Southey - you're offended? I'm offended that we have to spend so much keeping these people safe. Let them sort their own security out. Keep the queenie safe and her heir but let the others pay for their own bodyguards. I'm also offended that we still have unelected individuals playing a part in making the laws we have to live to. However lets sort out the lords first the monarchy can come later. And get those Bishops out of the Lords first. Why on earth should they have a say when there chief and secondary rabbis and immans and Sikh or hindu or Bhuddist religious leaders don't get the same rights. I mean we are a secular society and the monarch and Prince Charles are defenders of all faiths (especially what Charlie boy wants to be known as). Also Humanists and atheists should also be represented IF the Christians are. There is plenty to be offended about but the light hearted joke mugs and sick bags taking the **** out of a wedding is the least of it. However the rifle in the tower is perhaps a little close to the knuckle. Besides the Tower of London is way too far away to get a shot in or even see the procession anyway. At least get a place near the route. Some sniper he'd make.
Southey - you're offended? I'm offended that we have to spend so much keeping these people safe. Let them sort their own security out. Keep the queenie safe and her heir but let the others pay for their own bodyguards. I'm also offended that we still have unelected individuals playing a part in making the laws we have to live to. However lets sort out the lords first the monarchy can come later. And get those Bishops out of the Lords first. Why on earth should they have a say when there chief and secondary rabbis and immans and Sikh or hindu or Bhuddist religious leaders don't get the same rights. I mean we are a secular society and the monarch and Prince Charles are defenders of all faiths (especially what Charlie boy wants to be known as). Also Humanists and atheists should also be represented IF the Christians are. There is plenty to be offended about but the light hearted joke mugs and sick bags taking the **** out of a wedding is the least of it. However the rifle in the tower is perhaps a little close to the knuckle. Besides the Tower of London is way too far away to get a shot in or even see the procession anyway. At least get a place near the route. Some sniper he'd make.
Its my duty weekend at Scout Activity Centre - No TV and the first one that puts it on radio goes in river.
I'm working but it's double bubble, T.O.I.L. and all the car parks are free! There's a lot of folk not wanting to see the wedding...anyone on here who does just out of interest?
Oh yes, not notherd about all the guff and tat around it, but looking forward to watch our future king be wed.
