I think we're sort of forgetting the 'value' aspect here. I'll give you an example:
I have a Polar heart-rate monitor that I bought 5 years ago. It cost me 230 quid and lots of people said I was mad. It is able to collect data from bike sensors as well as altitude, temp, heart rate, etc. It can run interval training, it's waterproof, downloads to a computer so I can analyse my training and keep a long-term record - and it works really well.; however, I did not make the decision lightly as 230 quid is a lot of initial investment money.
Recently, after 5 years use, I damaged the case and it is now no longer waterproof, nor is it economical to repair. I'll need to get a new one and I just balked again at the price for a similar standard system. However, I did a cost-benefit analysis on the old one:
Cost: 230 quid
Use: I reckon 5 days a week, 48 weeks a year, over 5 years: that's 5 x 48 x 5 = 1200 times used.
That's a cost to me of 0.2 pence per use - each use usually 45 to 60 mins on average. so, making a conservative estimate, that's 0.0067 pence/minute. I'd say that's good value and it doesn't even start to include the benefits to my fitness and the pleasure I've had using it.
So, what's the point of the rambling rubbish I've just written?
If the guy who's just bought a Ray Mears shirt at 95 quid has that shirt for a number of years and uses it regularly, it actually turns out to be a good investment. You can trade this against buying cheaper, less durable items which you have to go through the inconvenience of having to replace more often. Again, it doesn't count the pleasure of being outside - can you quantify that?
It's up to the individual to decide whether the quality and durability of the garment is worth the cost (if the garment was rubbish, of course it wouldn't be worth 95 quid!).
The bottom line is it's not worth paying a lot of money for something you rarely use but it is worth paying a bit extra for that bit of gear which is regularly worn/used in pursuit of a pleasurable hobby.
The only flaw to the above argument is that you could effectively use it to persuade yourself to buy anything.
Damn...:twak:
The only flaw in your statement is your maths is wrong. It's actually about 19p per use.
I wouldn't pay 90 quid for a shirt, but I would pay 140 for a paramo waterproof or some other good things. But we don't need all expensive kit, but if you want to fair enough, but the price of your kit does not make you a better bushcrafter.