Ah, the Religion of Progress...............
There's technological progress, economic progress and social progress. They move together.............
- Social progress: it's not the level of tolerance that's changed, it's the taboos are different.
I would argue that the peak of tolerance was about 25 years ago when campaigns for core social inequality were won. However, a new intolerance rose from the ashes of the successful campaigns..... if you don't agree with the predominant social narrative, you are an evil person these days. Gone are the days when one could have civilised disagreement. Social media seems to be a big driver- polarising views. Disagreement has become very tribal. Instead of shaming out-of-wedlock birth, we "cancel" those who won't believe that a person can turn into a cat...... or won't entertain the suggestion that if you import 10m more people, you might just need to deal with the requirement for more infrastructure otherwise you get problems..... etc etc etc same intolerance, different taboos.
- Economic progress seems to be about "growth" which is not possible on a planet with finite resources. "Growth" being about consuming more and more. Culture teaches people to want things NOW rather than save up and wait for it. Success judged by how much "stuff" is accumulated, or the type of stuff (e.g. car type/brand). There is the idea (started by Jack Welch) that business must do anything to maximise shareholder growth irrespective of the damage caused- and so we have offshoring and loss of local jobs, an aircraft manufacturer hiding quality issues, and exploitation of people to produce this high-consumption lifestyle that is sold (and mostly believed) as being desirable.
- Technological progress. Some good stuff, but also a lot of incremental and me-too updates. Quite a few downsides which are not really topics we are allowed to talk about. We get what we are given- works for the people selling it but maybe not all the users. Not much discussion of whether an "update" really is a benefit for the end user. Often the costs are hidden- e.g. we don't see the waste from refining rare earth metals as that's on the other side of the world, we are just glad we don't have exhaust fumes in our town (moving from ICE to EV in this case). We don't ask whether the technology is addressing the problem or finding a problem to solve, often by generating desire for something we didn't know we wanted/needed (because actually- we didn't/don't).
Overall....... the speed and demands of life increase, everything is more fragile, the local environment is noisier and angrier, social connections are impacted. Many folks won't notice for a while as they are insulated by their stuff and social status, but others do realise. Some realise sooner- like
@Woody girl - and are in effect the canaries in the coal mine.
I follow the writings of John Michael Greer, some very thought provoking stuff, and based on the idea that we have effectively adopted "progress" as a religion to replace Christianity. (He is seen by some as a bit controversial as he correctly predicted that Trump would beat Clinton- in some eyes this made him a supporter of Trump, when in fact he just studied the ACTUAL social vibes and made predictions from what was really going on rather than the wishful thinking media reports).
His novel "Retrotopia" is an interesting read. As are some of his non-fiction works e.g. "The Long Descent: A users guide to the end of the world." He is not a catastrophist, rather he looks at history and how empires fell to predict how western civilisation might end up (spoiler: it's a gradual crumble as demands outrun available resources, not a sudden bang). He also has an interesting blog- Ecosophia.
GC