For a while now, I have been thinking, or at least trying to think , outside the "Woodlore" design box. I am also trying to extend the range of the knives abilities to perform bush and wood crafts styles activities. Whether or not I am going to succeed remains to be seen of course!
So there are my new babies.
The larger one is 8 1/4" long, blade length 4", widest part of the blade is 1 1/4". I am using thinner 01 tool steel, 3/32 (2.5mm approx) for both of these new knives.
A few reasons for this: less weight, less cost, thinner blades, a little easier/faster to make the knives, all have an impact of the cost of the finished knives.
Because the blades are wider and thinner, it will help with food prep, also make it easier to make fuzz sticks, etc, without loosing strength on the blade. In fact fairly similar to the knives I made when I first started in knife making. They both have a straight back, same idea as for the Skookum bush tools, and for the same reasons, but more comfortable.
Simpler handle shapes, nicely rounded with no sharp edges. The rounded ends sit very comfortably in the palm of the hand, making it easy to manipulate the knives around. Also, but can't be seen easily on those pics, the thumb scallops on the handles near the blades, making is easier to have a non slip thumb/index grip on the knife.
Both of these have scandi grinds, but I am also experimenting with (dare I say it) convex grind o !) for those blades.
The smaller one is 7 1/4" long, the blade 3 1/4" long and 3/4" wide, 2.5mm thick, should still perform the same tasks, albeit maybe be more slowly. Also easier to keep discreetly out of sight. This one should also be a good carving knife/neck knife.
I see them working as a pair, although they should both be good bush knives on their own.
Mountain men and hunters of old, were almost always carrying more than one knives, one being a "patch" knife, I see the little one performing that task, for which the larger one is too large and more awkward to use.
So , what are your thoughts on the ideas behind the knives? Preferably constructive of course
So there are my new babies.
The larger one is 8 1/4" long, blade length 4", widest part of the blade is 1 1/4". I am using thinner 01 tool steel, 3/32 (2.5mm approx) for both of these new knives.
A few reasons for this: less weight, less cost, thinner blades, a little easier/faster to make the knives, all have an impact of the cost of the finished knives.
Because the blades are wider and thinner, it will help with food prep, also make it easier to make fuzz sticks, etc, without loosing strength on the blade. In fact fairly similar to the knives I made when I first started in knife making. They both have a straight back, same idea as for the Skookum bush tools, and for the same reasons, but more comfortable.
Simpler handle shapes, nicely rounded with no sharp edges. The rounded ends sit very comfortably in the palm of the hand, making it easy to manipulate the knives around. Also, but can't be seen easily on those pics, the thumb scallops on the handles near the blades, making is easier to have a non slip thumb/index grip on the knife.
Both of these have scandi grinds, but I am also experimenting with (dare I say it) convex grind o !) for those blades.
The smaller one is 7 1/4" long, the blade 3 1/4" long and 3/4" wide, 2.5mm thick, should still perform the same tasks, albeit maybe be more slowly. Also easier to keep discreetly out of sight. This one should also be a good carving knife/neck knife.
I see them working as a pair, although they should both be good bush knives on their own.
Mountain men and hunters of old, were almost always carrying more than one knives, one being a "patch" knife, I see the little one performing that task, for which the larger one is too large and more awkward to use.
So , what are your thoughts on the ideas behind the knives? Preferably constructive of course
Last edited: