Just me that sees the practical application of brightly coloured tents/clothing? There's a reason survival bags are bright orange. Personally I favour function over form.
Just me that sees the practical application of brightly coloured tents/clothing? There's a reason survival bags are bright orange. Personally I favour function over form.
If in a real emergency is scrambling in a kit bag for an air market panel a viable option? I agree they look gawdy I don't think anyone can deny that but I would sooner see hi viz allover a moorside than hear of someone dying because they couldn't be found by rescue teams. Personally I'm a great advocate of carrying mini flares after a personal experience. But they can start fires
I'm going to stay out of the ethics of it and say that from a lot of the higher end tent producers points of view that their flagship tents tend to go on expeditions. A lot of the time this can be either high altitude of somewhere where the weather is going to be bad and visibility can be low. Trying to find a tent when you're tired in a blizard is pretty hard so they tend to be bright in colour. Also if you are tent bound in a storm for days the lighter conditions can stop you going stir crazy.
They also look "good" in promo.photos and so aspirational to the buying public hence why they sell so well.
Personally I like to blend in and prefer green, but at the time I bought my last exped tent (Hilleberg Tarra) I could only get it in red, and the thing lasts so well that.it'll still be about for years. My.other tents are more muted though my Tipi is canvas coloured.
Sent via smoke-signal from a woodland in Scotland.
+1 to that.I think to even bring it into the same conversation as ethics gives it more validity than it deserves.
People wear what ever colour they want, if a person wants a red or yellow tent then i don't see how it's anyone else's business.
Sorry it that seems to come across as rude, but if we start telling people what colours they should wear and the colour of their tents they should buy then should we also tell people that live in the countryside that they can't buy bright coloured cars or farm machinery?
Where does it stop, should all people that walk past a cemetery be made to put on black clothing?
Fortunately we live in countries were we wear what we want in what ever colour we want, there are already far to many rules and regulations we have to live by because some busy body (is that phrase still used?) has complained loudly about something.
It's not as though tents are dotted over every landscape daily, i can't remember the last time i saw a tent of any colour while out hiking, even those of us that wild camp do it late in the evening and break camp early in the morning.
My tents could be dayglow green with red spots and you'd only be able to see it for maybe 1 hour before moonlight takes over.
To put it into the same category as littering i find not only ridiculous and ignorant but also insulting.
I don't use the word ignorant lightly either, littering is a criminal offence, camping (in any colour tent) is at worst a civil offence, so it's worth putting things into context.
I think to even bring it into the same conversation as ethics gives it more validity than it deserves.
People wear what ever colour they want, if a person wants a red or yellow tent then i don't see how it's anyone else's business.
Sorry it that seems to come across as rude, but if we start telling people what colours they should wear and the colour of their tents they should buy then should we also tell people that live in the countryside that they can't buy bright coloured cars or farm machinery?
Where does it stop, should all people that walk past a cemetery be made to put on black clothing?
Fortunately we live in countries were we wear what we want in what ever colour we want, there are already far to many rules and regulations we have to live by because some busy body (is that phrase still used?) has complained loudly about something.
It's not as though tents are dotted over every landscape daily, i can't remember the last time i saw a tent of any colour while out hiking, even those of us that wild camp do it late in the evening and break camp early in the morning.
My tents could be dayglow green with red spots and you'd only be able to see it for maybe 1 hour before moonlight takes over.
To put it into the same category as littering i find not only ridiculous and ignorant but also insulting.
I don't use the word ignorant lightly either, littering is a criminal offence, camping (in any colour tent) is at worst a civil offence, so it's worth putting things into context.
My two cents - when I was doing fieldwork in central Africa, wearing camo instantly would have made me a target - locals would ask (nervously) if you were a 'mercenary', while police and military would react very aggressively, so a real no-no. Military gear is generally cheap and tough (although often made by the lowest bidding contractor), but I still have an ingrained resistance to wearing camo. I'm also a bit fazed by the number of wanna-be squaddies or 'survivalists' who see it as an image choice - personally, I like to be seen as more of a 'woodsman' than an ex-military type.
But, after all, it's each to their own, and I think that, in some situations, camo would be the obvious choice. If I was in a 'tactical' scenario, I would do my best to be difficult to detect. But not in Starbucks. In central Manchester.
Thanks for the input. The forum is UK based. We could have a different topic to talk about clothing types elsewhere in the world if you like. Personally I'm not interested in what to wear in Africa. Some may find your post really useful however.
I did find it an interesting post actually - fair and well reasoned, and one that I resonate with. No need to shoot them down!