I'd just like to say that for one I picked up on the legals side of the argument, as I know a little about it, leaving the medical question for the pro's.
But whilst focusing on the legals, and I think we all agree that as far as the law goes it's a big no no, we are ignoring some of the medical points and those revolve around whether this kind of intervention is necessary and it would seem to me that the giving of fluids is no longer done by first responders and is only done by primary carers in hospital when there is an idea of whats going on.
The other thing that has been discussed here, but perhaps again put in the shade by the legals, is how current is your training. This I suspect goes hand in hand with the point above and the question of qualifications. I agree that you do not need to have a bundle of qualifications to be good at something after all any first aid training I had expired along time ago, something I'm addressing but if you are diabetic, need injections I'm your man. My wife is diabetic and when she went through a bad patch of being poorly controlled I would frequently treat her Hypo's administer Glucagon injections,
a replacement for giving Glugose fluids if I believe although I might be wrong about that, and take blood for blood sugar monitoring. However, despite having medically qualified parents, grand parents a wife training as a midwife and the above experience I know nothing! and what I do know is only kept up todate by my wife and her diabetic consultant. So I guess what I'm saying is that unless you move in the right circles is hard to keep up todate with the changes in the medical profession. As an example I probably haven't had to give my wife a jab for two possibly three years as she is now on an insulin pumb and the need for external intervention due to hypo is greatly minimised.
I'd initially joined in on this thread for two reasons. The first was a little silly but I'd taken to heart the use of the word 'numtys' but secondly because I was horrified that you can buy this stuff fairly easily.
This view, I have to say, has changed from one of horror to one of ooh what should I be buying. Someone on here posted saying they take needles and the like on foreign trips where the use of dirty medical equipment is common. This is the most sense I've heard in a long time and not something I've heard of before. So in this case I would probably take this advice and stock up.
From an end of the NHS/civilisation point of view I just wonder how helpful a couple of bags of fluid would be, certainly not a long term solution to your survival I'm guessing. Before I'm accused of being flippant, I certainly don't really mean to be, after all my family has an escape and evasion bag, which contains clothes, water and wifes spare medical stuff. But we have to face the realisation that this bag is only a short term answer to a question that could result in the wife not surviving. My wifes medical surplies for three months take up a huge amount of space and this does not include the other stuff required to keep her ticking over. I just wonder how many of us appreciate the volume of equipment needed to survive long term and in reality whether we have the funds and space to keep it all, and replace what goes out of date! After all the NHS is struggling with it!
All of the above is IMHO and I don't mean any offence. In addition this is not to under sell the legal question. I work for a commerical law firm which has a small litigation department which is ever growing and increasingly making a lot of money. This is thanks to the sue culture that we now live in. It would also seem from the usual corridor banter, that is common in offices, that an increasing number of these cases are medically related. This is obvisously directed at medical professionals and is very sad!
Pib