If it were a case, like smallpox, which we have more or less eradicated, or polio, which we damned well ought to have eradicated by now, that by taking the vaccine I could help wipe out the disease, then even with the reaction, and potentially a worse reaction than I have previously had (I carry an epi-pen for allergies) then yes, I would have the jag.
But they can't say that because this damned virus (family of virus'? ) keeps mutating, changing, and we can't get on top of it enough to wipe it out.
Therefore our own immune systems need to learn to deal with it in some fashion.
I am very glad (and immensely grateful for the NHS and everyone who pays their National Insurance) that we live now, though.
I've carefully made sure that my son took the paracetamol, did drink enough fluids, etc., but I knew that if something did not look like straightforward flu, then help is at the end of the phone....and that paracetamol costs pennies here. We are incredilby fortunate.
I agree with Paul that this vaccine is a personal decision, perhaps made with advice from your GP. They say that hospitals are struggling under the sheer numbers of people coming in with flu though. Does the vaccine actually help reduce those pressures ? because most folks I know who have this flu just thole it at home until they're better.
It's not like the vaccines for rubella or diphtheria or the like that we know work to give immunity; this one seems more than a little hit or miss, tbh.
Healthcare workers ? No getting away from it, flu's a misery, if I did their job and I could take the vaccine without any issues, then I think I'd take it, but that too is my choice.
M