Anyway, quick nip into Sainsbury's and I didn't even have my phone with me, just my purse in my jacket pocket, and at the high point of the village the road curves around an old high sandstone wall (primary school's on top, now it's been turned into flats) and as I turned there was a green puffa coat clad something lying on the pavement....the other side of the road has a garden area in front of another high sandstone wall and that's where the main display goes though now it's still Christmas stuff. Lots of scarecrows earlier, and I was past the green coat thinking it was one of the scarecrows when I realised with appalled horror that it was most likely actually someone collapsed. No way to turn easily, and I didn't have my phone, but in my rear view mirror I saw another car stop and the hazards come on. So at least I knew someone was going to deal, to help, I hoped.
I feel guilty, but rationally I know that by the time I did manage to get turned around and back, help was clearly happening and I really don't think that there was anything I could do to help anyway.
Spoke with a neighbour about it, and she had heard nothing, but understood why my first thought was a scarecrow not a body. Then she said that she would have just kept out of the way anyhow, unless it had happened right in front of her, and she wouldn't have had a clue what to do then anyway.
I get angry quickly, but it dies just as fast. I don't run away from a disagreement/conflict but try to be rational about dispute. I don't think it's my nature to do nothing but keep out of the way.
It was just a kind of mental rambling when I tripped across a comment elsewhere about fight, flight or fawn.
I sort of wondered how the rest of us react to things. I think the recent news stories too have influenced my mind on this. Not just the Bondi beach news, but the Scottish news has an article about Gwen Mayor, the Dunblane teacher who was killed defending her pupils in 1996, and how a trust set up in her name has been awarding funds to children's groups, as well as her being given one of the first Elizabeth medals.
It's that time of year isn't it ?
Retrospection seems to prevail.
M
I think you did what you could taking some assumptions into account - You didn't have a means to communicate what you thought you saw , you were in a car and it would have been difficult to turnaround and you saw car hit their hazards assuming that they would be hopefully attending.
I think for what you could do , safely without endangering yourself , you did it.
We can beat ourselves up a little sometimeswith head games of ' I should have ' etc
With regards to your other examples - I think we all WANT to think we will act selflessly and nobily in an altruistic act. This is a lofty ideal - those that run towards gun fire , towards the burning house , towards the person being mugged by several opponents etc.
I was watching the TV the other night and it was covering the sinking of the Titanic ( spoiler ) - it focused in upon those that managed to rally one or two of the Lifeboats and to return to pick up some of the remaining survivors still bobbing in the freezing sea.
There was a majority reticence it seemed of those in the lifeboats already 'safe' to return to the cries and rescue more survivors still in the water - even although space was available.
My wife turned to me and asked If i was in one boats if I would have returned , it threw me for a moment. - Of course I WANT to think I would act and save lives , in the safety of my warm house, in my armchair , dry , well fed - its easy to armchair quarterback it and try to paint oneself in the best of noble lights that ones wants to be thought of.
But clearly - There was a reason those people , other survivors already in the boat resisted - they were there , I wasn't - so how can I say I would definitely act differently to them under the same circumstances??
I pointed out I probably wouldn't have been in a boat in the 1st place , due to Gender and class - but even if I ignore those things could I say with certaintity I would ? I can't - Because I don't know if I would or would not.
I can only hope I would.
I think we all want to imagine we will act in the way we would want ourselves too do - but in , lets call it a crisis type event - would we?
How could you know?
One of my combative instructors talks about how when ever he flies he purchases Two cans of coke or soft drink as soon as he can once boarding.
His justification is , if he was fated to board a flight that would be hijacked he would then have an available option.
One can for drinking - the other remains sealed as an impromptu impact weapon for resistance.
Would he act in such a way if that situation ever did come to light???
I guess he has at least the basic plan of 'how' and if its a habit , its becoming an engrained one.
Again , we can all fantasise about such serious things but ultimately we can't 'know'.
The examples you've given - I doubt that those people have ever considered the question itself or how they would react- they probably acted from a place of gross adrenaline , anger, love , defiance- just an altruistic autopilot taking over.
No over thinking. ( Probably no thinking at all )
No Ego .
No sense of danger to self.
And of course in reflection they serve as inspiration to many of us and create these questions about how we believe we may act.