I believe many officers in the Japanese Imperial Army were of a higher social class and used own swords. They had "proper" handcrafted swords. The officers of lower classes had issued cheapo swords.
The US soldiers took home a huge number of swords, both quality and junk. They come up on actions a lot today.
In the programme I observed something that puzzled me. In the beginning they used a smallish lump of the Iron Sand material (Tamahagne). Some minutes in when they were hammering, pieces fell off ( saw two or three pieces falling off)
Then, they added bits of a more industrial looking steel ( when they stacked them). Also when they worked it they added (dipped/rolled) the main piece in powdered steel. So more "other" steel added.
In my 'research" I have read that the Iron Sands produce a very poor quality steel, takes forever to get rid of the impurities, then a very complex process to make into steel using charcoal. But this was historically one of the few ways they got Iron in Japan.
Even the Japanese handcrafted knives crafted today use modern steels of various grades. Very few are using Tamahagane for the core/ cutting edge
My and my son's knives, made by a small family that trade under the name Moritaka Hamono, use two grades of the edge steel, Aogami #2 and Aogami Super.
I am a Japanofile.
I have seen untold TV programmes and read truckloads of books about the Japanese culture, about most things. One thing I have always wondered about is the "10 year learning"
10 years to leant to make Sushi. 10 years to learn to make noodles. 10 years to learn to make blades. It is always 10 years.
I wonder if they use an expression - translated o '10 years' , to say 'a long time' or similar?
Aye Up,
Janne - yes, I appreciate that most of those swords were of the mass produced variety but amongst them must have been some real gems. I wonder who ended up with them?
Re the process, too right there wasn't much given away.
Putting the spiritual and decorative aspects aside, I would have been interested in how a sword made by hand as shown compared for instance to swords made elsewhere e.g. to a British cavalry sabre and to a modern day, mass produced version of the samurai using current steels - machine or hand finished. Does taking so long to make the sword really give a technically superior result?
Are they better than a mass produced blade/sword?
I own German and Swedish kitchen knives. I own Japanese kitchen knives. Three brands of hand made ones, then 4 brands of factory made ones.
Steels from Sandviken, Solingen, Aogami #2, Aogami Super, Blue #2, White #1 and #2. VG10.
A couple of S/s Damascus and carbon Damascus.
Function? if well sharpened/honed - no difference. Zero. Zilch. They all cut well.
The handmade ones are more reactive than the European carbon knives I think.
The main difference is in the shape of the blades, the Japanese traditional shapes have a more 'narrow' use.
The main difference is in the 'feel'. Tradition. Knowing a guy is spending his life bashing bits of steel using a hammer and anvil. To create the best he can, for me.
Yeah, I am a kitchen knife nerd. Totally. I even travel with a kitchen knife in the main luggage. Wife understands my addiction. Because of her understanding we are still married!
If anybody is interested in things Japanese there is a superb series called Japanology you can watch on Youtube. the earlier programmes are better imho.