Tengu said:BTW, Abbe Osram, `what` football hooligans?
I have stewarded last two seasons and not met any.
Wayne said:Abbe i live on the coast and every year people are rescued in their epensive yachts with no equipment. One yachtsman had to be rescued twice in a week after putting to sea with no radio or flares and wtas trying to navigate using an AA road map.
Frustrating and expensive each life boat launch costs thousands. The crew gave him a serious talking to. I think these people are going beyond unlucky to negilent. However once the precendant is set and we put value judgements on the rescue then before long we will all be facing bills or compulsary insurance.
I have been to your home town. The conditions can get rough, If your out checking your traps in the woods and you need aid who decides your behaviour was unreasonable. Probably would be some government offical with no outdoor experience.
Abbe Osram said:I understand you mate, it must be frustrating with that kind of people.
Yes, they would help me and get me out. But if I would do the same mistake as the rich guy in his boat and the boys would have to get me twice out of the forest.
I believe everyone in town would know about the stupid guy (me) and laugh about me. I want to make damm sure I really need them before I call for help.
cheers
Abbe
gregorach said:One thought on the whole insurance issue... We don't have crime insurance to pay for policing, we don't have fire insurance to pay for the Fire Bridage (although we do have fire insurance to cover the damage), and we don't have ambulance insurance to pay for health emergencies. All these emergency services are paid for by taxes. Why should mountain rescue or the RNLI be any different?
bambodoggy said:I quite agree, I was only mentioning Jersey as a point of interest![]()
Wayne said:Abbe your correct football hooligans and other undesirables cost the economy a lot to police. The current UK prison population is vast,
There is a difference in the costs of policing criminals to that of a rescue of the criminally stupid. Unless you suggesting we should make being under prepared or skilled an offence.
I try not to get too upset by the idiots that need rescue because the conditions are more harsh than they expected.
That is our fault as a society anyway as we are producing a generation of people with little exposure to the outdoors and any sort of risk. Therefore how can they judge the risks they are taking with no frames of reference to guide them.
We need to promote education, a love for the outdoors in our schools and promote self reliance.
stotRE said:Did Meriweather lewis and William clark have rescue backup when President Thomas Jefferson ordered them to explore lands west to the pacific?
We need to be more like the Scandinavians and less like the Medterraineans.![]()
BOD said:I wonder what the public attitude is in the UK concerning David Sharp who died on Everest and the fact that no one attempted to rescue him despite being only a few feet from him.
Admittedly Everest is in a different league of mountain from the situation talked about in this thread and he was a competent climber and not underprepared.
Should others have defered their summmit bid and bring him down?
QUOTE]
The BBC report indicates he was ill prepared:
Speaking to the Close Up programme on New Zealand television, Mr Inglis said: "The trouble is that at 8,500m (27,887ft) it is extremely difficult to keep yourself alive, let alone keep anyone else alive.
"It was like 'What do we do?' We couldn't do anything. He had no oxygen, no proper gloves, things like that.
"On that morning, over 40 people went past that young Brit. I was one of the first."
I'd have thought that any action, however futile, to help him would be worthwhile but if you are driven enough to want to climb Everest maybe ego comes first.
Whatever happened to the concept of the 'Good Samaritan'?