The BJP is still going as far as I know. It used to be very commercial but I think they've gone a bit more studenty these days.
A different direction
- Thread starter Wayland
- Start date
-
Hey Guest, Early bird pricing on the Summer Moot (29th July - 10th August) available until April 6th, we'd love you to come. PLEASE CLICK HERE to early bird price and get more information.
That first photo is not sea defences, it's a lost generation, deprived of their computers, prematurely grey, stooped and faceless marching into the icy waters, like Lemmings.
All excellent photos though.
All excellent photos though.
It's like 10,000 naked people sitting on the beach waiting to jump in the water (at least the top part of the structure).
More morbidly, the first word that popped in to my head was 'holocaust', as in mass graves.
I will book an appointment with a shrink in the morning.
More morbidly, the first word that popped in to my head was 'holocaust', as in mass graves.
I will book an appointment with a shrink in the morning.
As a matter of interest. This is the spot where a ship ran aground last week.
http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16202283
Hope there is not too much pollution.
http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16202283
Hope there is not too much pollution.
missed this comment the first time around... interesting..
From what I remember reading on the POTN forums, the earlier Canon DSLRs couldn't do IR as there was an optical low-pass filter fitted in front of the CCD. Back then the options were 1) have the LP filter removed (and void the warranty) or 2) take a normal shot and manipulate it in software to mimic a similar effect.. Have they got rid of the LP filter on the newer models? or is it still there and thus the reason for the long exposure times?
There is still a filter in place so that does lead to very long exposures.
You can still remove that which is something I might do with mine if I ever get an upgrade.
I could pop out and try your 10D if you like before sending it back to you.
You can still remove that which is something I might do with mine if I ever get an upgrade.
I could pop out and try your 10D if you like before sending it back to you.
From what I've read on the subject, the long exposue times will lead to a lot of pixel noise on the 10D... the newer cameras (bearing in mind the 10D is something like 8 years old now) have better noise reduction capability
Well I was very impressed with the noise handling for the Aurora shots so I'll pop off a test shot for you next time I'm out.
Really? I was a bit concerned that the noise handling might not have been up to the job with it being an older camera..
Would be interesting to know what software you use to convert from (I assume) Raw, and what techniques you use to deal with noise... but that's probably a thread in itself...
Shot at f4 15 seconds on iso.800 Processed through Lightroom 2
Yes there is noise but it's not unsightly. In fact it's more like film grain than some of the noise I see on underexposed shots from my 5D
Any chance of a copy of the original RAW file? - I'd like to run it through the software I use (Phase One C1 SE) to see how the noise reduction compares on the same area100%
Similar threads
