I'm not sure case law is applicable to day to day policing. Statutory acts are generally not that woolly unless knowingly misapplied, for example, "its illegal to photograph a police officer", "its illegal to be naked in public", "the police have the right to stop and search without specific intelligence at midnight, midweek, ten miles away from the nearest football club."
Or, "we won't arrest the perp in a domestic violence incident unless the victim press charges," "its not in the public interest to arrest someone being threatening to healthcare staff as they are public workers and should have a higher tolerance of abusive language than the general public", "my warrant card overrides the DPA"
I'm not a copper nor a lawyer but I have near daily interaction with them from civvy staff, PCSO, PC, custody staff through to Inspectors.
Some have excellent knowledge, attitude and apparent interpretation of how the law is applied
So how come its only some and not most?
I guess we have different expectations and experiences of them. I dont think it unreasonable to expect them to be experts in the laws the police have our consent to enforce
But I'll happily agree to disagree
