Wayland said:
For example, there is a huge industry producing outdoor clothing, but most is designed for walking down the high street rather than beating through a forest. When someone asks what the best shirt for bushcraft and sitting round a fire is, although many will actually do the job, most times only one or two brands get recommended.
Naturally enough, there will then be a slightly uniform look at the next meet up, which is seen around the fire and in pictures on the forum by newcomers who then think "If everyone else is wearing them, they must be right."
It's a natural progression and a fairly harmless one providing people do not believe that you need the expensive kit to even take part.
Which, IMHO is a good representation of why some folks have/will become anti as you say.
I am pretty much still an outsider on this forum, but have noticed that certain items of equipment are vastly favoured by a large majority of folks who consider themselves bush-crafters* ( I choose that term carefully). In a capitalist society, this must surely be nonsense, as there will be literally hundreds of choices for most pieces of equipment. As other posters have said, if a knife cuts it is good enough, and almost any shirt will do for walking around the camp fire.
As for the original question "why is everyone so against the good things about the hobby recently?" I am not sure if that is the correct question to ask!
I say that because most folks still like to get outdoors, and to be with nature, but the objects for criticism seem to be branded products, and not what you do with them. In this light, it may be clearer why some people would not want Bear Grylls gear.
From my own limited experience with 'bushcraft kit' (I predominantly design and build lightweight outdoor kit), I did note that while I was employed as a bushcraft/survival instructor, that many civilian students would often think they needed particular brands of equipment, with Gransfors (mentioned in this thread) axes, and maxpedition bags being prime examples.
Perhaps older/bolder bushcrafters see this as jumping on a band wagon, or being sheep like, which could invite negativity!
The problem is further worsened by commercial adverts or 'outdoor schools' who may describe things like mora clipper knifes as starter, or training knives...As far as I am aware there is a certain chap called Mors who quite likes clipper knives, and he is not really often regarded as a novice in bushcraft. So, yet again, this could introduce a stigma, in that many folks want the most expensive knives (as they are perceived as the only ones that work!). Now, folks who know that a sharp knife is pretty much a sharp knife, and that literally billions of people around the world get by perfectly with any old knife, will find it odd or perhaps annoying that something they cherish is no good (despite its history of being perfect).
The above is why I don't understand why the quote "that's really nice, shows there's more to life than Gransfors." is negative.....as its completely true!. There is much more to life than one brand of axe!
It could well be that the folks who only recommend gransfors are the blinkered and negative ones. It would be odd to walk around a 'stilt long hut village' in the Amazon, and see: carvings; canoes; fences and houses, only to tell the occupants that their home made axes (that they have used daily for thousands of years) should really be made by Gransfors.....The evidence to the contrary would be all around you.
I chose the phrase 'people who consider themselves bushcrafters' As I, like many of you have met people from all over the world, who work outdoors daily; make their own equipment; live in the wilderness/jungle; have to catch their own food, and virtually none of them (outside of the UK) would not consider themselves as bush craft people. On the other hand, I have also taught hundreds and hundred of folks who not only considered themselves as bushcrasfters, but made sure their circle of friends knew it too...........Despite only spending one or two nights out (near to habitation) per month, and carrying a vast amount of gear with them.
Maybe it is this last group of outdoor enthusiasts that some are rebelling against or being negative to