Jamie
Just remember that building up to the purchase is half the fun. Dont let assorted complications/ dire warnings spoil it too much.
Scopes are an even bigger bone of contention than rifles at times. There is an addage 'you get what you pay for' and does seem to apply to scopes often.
That said, we are dealing with the human world again - I have seen three Zeiss scopes with broken reticles and at the other end know regular shooters who fitted Tasco a decade ago and havent touched the scope since!
Slightly embarrassed to admit that a I probably spent about £2000 on assorted 'nefarious' scopes and the ammo required to constantly re/ check zero before splashing out £250 on a Schimdt Bender and another £80 on good mounts 6 years ago - but rapidly recouped outlay in saved ammo and much reduced faffing about.
Simmons are very popular, but in experience of about a dozen of them on various full bore rifles I have found quality variable. All tended to have very short eye relief ( causing 'scoping to eyebrow if not careful ) and their image quality was not on a par with many scopes. But that is pretty narrow experience and I'm not really qualified to judge Simmons. Others have told me that Simmons reputation comes from extensive use on Air rifles where these arent such issues?
Similiarly, retail package deals, tend to be an ok way to start, but not ideal. At risk of sounding like a dodgy car salesman, with your rifle 'quality is remembered long after the price forgotten' is a truism. Selling off family members for organ parts etc is entirely morally justified when setting up a hunting rifle...
Not a Remington fan - but pure prejudice on my part. Have observed they in general need a bit of setting up and TLC to reach the love'm to pieces standard. Tikka/ Sako/ Browning are there virtually out of the box.
Coming at it from the other end, the guest rifles I see that cause the least grief and have least hiccups tend to follow a pattern -
1. Sensible calibre for matter in hand. Think already done that one. Guests arriving with a .460 G & A for Roe stalking send a real warning signal!!!
2. Stainless or fluted barrel - cant figure why, but guys with these all seem to fall into 'competant' class and have few shooting issues. Cant put finger on it and I have neither so ???
3. Steel fixed mounts with solid rings - Tikka/ Sako Optilock, Millet, Kimber, Leupold etc. Not so impressed with Apel - which has a huge European reputation ( and price tag ). Every aluminium mount that goes on the hill seems to have problems. Add in sensible height - lots of people come with scopes - huge or not, mounted so far above the bore they need a sofa cushion taped to the stock - low is good.
4. Fixed power scopes - 4 to 6x range in 32-40 mm objective. The simpler the better - you want the costs spent on good lens, great coatings, solid tube, metal bearings on adjustment, solid tube/ body. Electronics, changable reticles, mega zoom ranges - all seem to detract from the fundamentals and just give another thing to fail. Scopes that never seem to give grief seem to be - Schimdt Bender, Leupold, the good Tasco production ( became very variable ), Nickel, Swarovski and reluctantly Zeiss ( production standards seem to very widely these days ).
Hope this is aiding rather than confusing.
Some good reading when starting out ( and later ) is Shots at Big Game by Craig Boddington and Make it Accurate by the same.