Draven said:
....I also tend to think that what shocked me most was that such a beautiful way of life was often, for lack of a better word, stomped upon. I know that it didn't always go that way... but I guess through the eyes of a child, I saw it much more black and white: we were killing them and kicking them off their own land. I suppose that now I'm older and more mature, I understand that it was nowhere near that simple, and a good deal of white people did get on with the Native Americans... Although still, at the risk of sounding naive, I really wish we all could have been more polite about the whole deal... ach, off topic.. oh well
I've done a great deal of reading on this subject, over the years, and while there is no way to address it adequetly in this post - I do find a lot of the early white colonial european commentary on it shows a lack of empathy with Native Americans. Eupropeans, English especially, just could not understand why NA were not more thankful for the "blessings" of civilization they sought to impart.
Many of the earliest white English settlers had mixed purpose, hoping at the same time to spread Christianity - while gaining land for themselves (my Englsih ancestors included). Scotts/Irish in the US, for the most part, were more honest. They just wanted the land and viewed as enemies anyone who stood in their way. They were also among the best at villifying the Native Americans as savages without culture. This attitude may have had something to do with their sojourn as outsiders in Ireland - some hardening of the heart toward natives.
The French, in their colonization of Quebec, had a rather different experience - in part because of their small numbers and different colonial aims. Some part of the French community eventually identified with Native Americans, finding their way of life superior to the colonial alternative and the number of French surnames on reservations and reserves to this day bears that out. These paticular French wanted no change in NA life style and culture - and one has to wonder what Canada would look like today had France not surrendered Canada in preference to the sugar islands.
One might point out that there are many Scots highlander names among reserves as well, derived from the fur trade era, but the situation is different as the Scots took "country" wives, to be abandoned upon return to civilization. The Scots, as usual, were there mainly for the money.
These generalizations are necessarily vague, given the amount of space available.