Voluntarily handing in a large blade to the UK police

Stew

Bushcrafter through and through
Nov 29, 2003
6,618
1,411
Aylesbury
stewartjlight-knives.com
Sorry @spokenword - Maybe we should be discussing this aspect in another thread rather than yours about handing in knives voluntarily.

I’d need to ask the agencies responsible for the pathway how they’d feel about unrequested modification of their pathway, in order to allay my concerns.

I’ve trespassed a lot in my time but I don’t leave traces. I’ve walked very many public paths but again, other than eating the odd blackberry I don’t alter anything.

I have no idea how an agency would react but I can’t help thinking that if a well meaning team offered to do some maintenance then the agency would want oversight.

The specific tools used might be an issue under those circumstances. This is all hypothetical. I’ll see who I can talk to here in Shropshire and maybe find out.
Get a grip. Needing to go ask permission before clearing overgrowth on a path? Don’t be silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikehill

Pattree

Full Member
Jul 19, 2023
2,168
1,162
77
UK
So much for “Leave no trace!”

Edited to add:
As stated above, I’ll talk to the local county agency and see what they say, then we will both know what we are talking about.

Now can we get back to @spokenword OP?
 

Stew

Bushcrafter through and through
Nov 29, 2003
6,618
1,411
Aylesbury
stewartjlight-knives.com
So much for “Leave no trace!”

Edited to add:
As stated above, I’ll talk to the local county agency and see what they say, then we will both know what we are talking about.

Now can we get back to @spokenword OP?
I have no issue with someone leaving the trace that they’ve opened a footpath back up.

You’re one of the worst for off topic chat so don’t feel the need to pull anyone else up on it either.
 

Broch

Life Member
Jan 18, 2009
8,492
8,369
Mid Wales
www.mont-hmg.co.uk
OK guys, I have a little experience of this from green lanes. It is the council and highways authorities responsibility to make all public rights of way passable and safe. If they do not, you're are entitled to clear such obstruction to enable safe passage - in my case I have taken a whole windblown oak off a BOAT. So, taking a cutting blade to clear a public right of way that is impassable is perfectly within your rights.
 
Jul 8, 2024
6
5
47
Oxfordshire
In fact I think I’m more concerned about your unscheduled activities than the tools that you were using.

?!

I’d need to ask the agencies responsible for the pathway how they’d feel about unrequested modification of their pathway, in order to allay my concerns.

I’ve trespassed a lot in my time but I don’t leave traces. I’ve walked very many public paths but again, other than eating the odd blackberry I don’t alter anything.

I have no idea how an agency would react but I can’t help thinking that if a well meaning team offered to do some maintenance then the agency would want oversight.

The specific tools used might be an issue under those circumstances. This is all hypothetical. I’ll see who I can talk to here in Shropshire and maybe find out.

I'm not sure what you think I was up to but to be clear, I was cutting a few brambles and nettles that were blocking access on a public footpath. With my consultant highway engineer and town planner hat on I can pretty confidently say that this would not be considered "modification of the pathway".

Apologies for hijacking a thread, but it seemed to have gone dead anyway. Thanks for the replies all.
 

haptalaon

Forager
Nov 16, 2023
112
73
34
South Wales
The rules about the zombie knifes remind me of the rules that killed off the free party scene in the 90s,

The law banned 'any gathering of 20 or more people where:
"music" includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats.
Which is kind of hilarious if it wasn't so needlessly destructive as well. Looks like we need to ban all concerts aside from Enya!

But yeah, the zombie knife laws are about creating a legal definition that targets a Certain Kind Of Person And Situation They Have In Mind, that are going to be applied and enforced in those situations. Does that make sense? Just like the '94 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act is not applied at Taylor Swift gigs, despite them being technically illegal.

If the amnesty will give you the full value for the knife then maybe, but they might well note down your details for administrative purposes and so then that's a bit of a privacy thing. & the odds of police randomly raiding your house are basically nil unless you're also up to something naughty.
 

Laurentius

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Aug 13, 2009
2,540
705
Knowhere
OK guys, I have a little experience of this from green lanes. It is the council and highways authorities responsibility to make all public rights of way passable and safe. If they do not, you're are entitled to clear such obstruction to enable safe passage - in my case I have taken a whole windblown oak off a BOAT. So, taking a cutting blade to clear a public right of way that is impassable is perfectly within your rights.
Out in the wilds of nowhere nobody is likely to see you or report you but on the estates that is another matter. There is a footpath near to me between two housing estates that I travel most days which the Council has allowed to become severely overgrown. I feel very tempted to have a go at it. I think it would be risky even with my electric hedge trimmer, which I do not think comes under the definition of a zombie knife yet as I am pretty sure that somebody would find an excuse to either prosecute or sue me, if not for anything else than flouting elfin safety laws. I do wonder if however I took my slasher out there having informed the Council first that I intended to do so whether I would be protected from the police at least. I guess a medium position would be to go out with a set of loppers and a pair of garden shears, they are neither the stuff of a chainsaw massacre or a zombie apocalypse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pattree

demented dale

Full Member
Dec 16, 2021
1,022
485
58
hell
Out in the wilds of nowhere nobody is likely to see you or report you but on the estates that is another matter. There is a footpath near to me between two housing estates that I travel most days which the Council has allowed to become severely overgrown. I feel very tempted to have a go at it. I think it would be risky even with my electric hedge trimmer, which I do not think comes under the definition of a zombie knife yet as I am pretty sure that somebody would find an excuse to either prosecute or sue me, if not for anything else than flouting elfin safety laws. I do wonder if however I took my slasher out there having informed the Council first that I intended to do so whether I would be protected from the police at least. I guess a medium position would be to go out with a set of loppers and a pair of garden shears, they are neither the stuff of a chainsaw massacre or a zombie apocalypse.
put on a hi viz and just go and do what you feel needs doing. dont tell anyone. no one will bat an eyelid but many will notice the good work x
 

demented dale

Full Member
Dec 16, 2021
1,022
485
58
hell
The rules about the zombie knifes remind me of the rules that killed off the free party scene in the 90s,

The law banned 'any gathering of 20 or more people where:

Which is kind of hilarious if it wasn't so needlessly destructive as well. Looks like we need to ban all concerts aside from Enya!

But yeah, the zombie knife laws are about creating a legal definition that targets a Certain Kind Of Person And Situation They Have In Mind, that are going to be applied and enforced in those situations. Does that make sense? Just like the '94 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act is not applied at Taylor Swift gigs, despite them being technically illegal.

If the amnesty will give you the full value for the knife then maybe, but they might well note down your details for administrative purposes and so then that's a bit of a privacy thing. & the odds of police randomly raiding your house are basically nil unless you're also up to something naughty.
I went to castle morton rave and I was on the crew for taylor swift gig last month. Taylor swift should be banned and zombie knives and wild free parties brought back. x
 

demented dale

Full Member
Dec 16, 2021
1,022
485
58
hell
Quick question: I have a large, new, unused Gerber BMF survival knife. All these new UK laws coming in will categorise it - there's a saw-back and the blade is large - as a zombie knife, which it really isn't. Really, I just can't be bothered trying to understand what is legal now, or in the future.

So, due to the fact that it's not the sort of thing that'll ever sell in the UK (I tried), any advice on simply taking it down (securely wrapped) to my local police station for them to destroy? Any potential problems with that? If so, would an ordinary junior hacksaw (don't own a vice) 'easily' reduce it to small non-threatening metal pieces.
Dont give anything to the police. if you want to hand something over then instead send it somewhere out of the country to an individual or organisation that will use it for its intended purpose. it is only the UK that has these psychotic paranoid amnestys, knee jerk reactions and laws to match. I live in Ireland. Theres none of that here. In fact please send all your implements of doom directly to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rarms

Kadushu

If Carlsberg made grumpy people...
Jul 29, 2014
944
1,024
Kent
Blimey, I've cut back hedges and brambles along several suburban footpaths and no one's ever complained. Quite the opposite in fact; people tend to be grateful for the improved access.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreyCat and Toddy

haptalaon

Forager
Nov 16, 2023
112
73
34
South Wales
I take care of the overgrown path next to my house - there are some nightshades growing there and lots of critters, so I hope that my work keeping a path through prevents the council chopping the whole lot flat. I've also taken a spade to it, as it's on a slope, to keep the path more path like
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddy

Laurentius

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Aug 13, 2009
2,540
705
Knowhere
I keep garden pruners in my jacket pocket. Little by little you can work wonders on a snarled path :)
I do have a pair of folding secateurs which I took out yesterday, garden shears would have been better but less convenient for a shopping trip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddy

spokenword

Tenderfoot
May 23, 2024
75
59
64
Surrey
OUTCOME

Firstly, couldn't care less about the money anymore. Wanted to surrender it to the police station, which I did today, just so that I could come back here with the result. I knew it was a gamble, but what the hell. For the sake of £100 it's worth it.

Included:
1. Home Office form multi-page form with name, bank details email and phone.
2. Two eBay USA printouts from two different sellers showing the same knife selling for about $800.
3. Many printed pictures of said knife.
4. One letter, explaining that it's a 'work' knife... not a 'killing' knife.

At Police Station:
Paperwork handed over counter first, then told to sit and wait. 15 mins later a door opens and I hand knife over. Door closes and ten minutes later I'm informed that it doesn't qualify for any compensation (not even £10) as it only has an 8 inch blade, not 'over' 8 inches. Yet they say it's still illegal to own. I ask for it back, but told I can't have it.

They then run around for 30 mins when I ask for clarification. In the end they say the titled document:

The Criminal Justice Act 1988
(Offensive Weapons) (Amendment,
Surrender and Compensation) Order
2024
... is an amendment and that the old pre-2024 law meant my knife was illegal anyway. I argued that's wrong, and that there is no reference to that old law, and that this amendment would surely supersede and replace anything previously put out by the Home Office. Fell on deaf ears, as they wouldn't have it any other way.

I point out that according to the diagram show in the above document document, (that I only just then became aware of, my mistake), if the blade is not over 8 inches and doesn't qualify for compensation, how can it be illegal - my mistake in not reading that bit. In fact the diagram first states, if not over 8 inches, no need to proceed. The reply from them was that the saw back edge makes it illegal anyway, regardless of the blade length. However, the above document then goes on to say, "If your weapon does not qualify under this scheme you may still surrender it to the police, but you cannot claim compensation."

So, and I don't mind being a test case here, any advice on how to proceed, or is it even worth it? Like I said, I don't care about the money, but would like to inform everyone that I can on what actually happens. It's interesting to me :) This will be useful for when they come after every fixed blade knife people on this forum own. Please don't say that won't happen. It will. Someone a few months ago in this thread said that they'll never get around to updating the law (or that it'll take an eternity to even get into gear). They were wrong. Fact: it was put into law within a few weeks of Labour getting into power.

Here's the info I found on the previous law:

 
Last edited:

TeeDee

Full Member
Nov 6, 2008
10,993
4,099
50
Exeter
OUTCOME

Firstly, couldn't care less about the money anymore. Wanted to surrender it to the police station, which I did today, just so that I could come back here with the result. I knew it was a gamble, but what the hell. For the sake of £100 it's worth it.

Included:
1. Home Office form multi-page form with name, bank details email and phone.
2. Two eBay USA printouts from two different sellers showing the same knife selling for about $800.
3. Many printed pictures of said knife.
4. One letter, explaining that it's a 'work' knife... not a 'killing' knife.

At Police Station:
Paperwork handed over counter first, then told to sit and wait. 15 mins later a door opens and I hand knife over. Door closes and ten minutes later I'm informed that it doesn't qualify for any compensation (not even £10) as it only has an 8 inch blade, not 'over' 8 inches. Yet they say it's still illegal to own. I ask for it back, but told I can't have it.

They then run around for 30 mins when I ask for clarification. In the end they say the titled document:

The Criminal Justice Act 1988
(Offensive Weapons) (Amendment,
Surrender and Compensation) Order
2024
... is an amendment and that the old pre-2024 law meant my knife was illegal anyway. I argued that's wrong, and that there is no reference to that old law, and that this amendment would surely supersede and replace anything previously put out by the Home Office. Fell on deaf ears, as they wouldn't have it any other way.

I point out that according to the diagram show in the above document document, (that I only just then became aware of, my mistake), if the blade is not over 8 inches and doesn't qualify for compensation, how can it be illegal - my mistake in not reading that bit. In fact the diagram first states, if not over 8 inches, no need to proceed. The reply from them was that the saw back edge makes it illegal anyway, regardless of the blade length. However, the above document then goes on to say, "If your weapon does not qualify under this scheme you may still surrender it to the police, but you cannot claim compensation."

So, and I don't mind being a test case here, any advice on how to proceed, or is it even worth it? Like I said, I don't care about the money, but would like to inform everyone that I can on what actually happens. It's interesting to me :) This will be useful for when they come after every fixed blade knife people on this forum own. Please don't say that won't happen. It will. Someone a few months ago in this thread said that they'll never get around to updating the law (or that it'll take an eternity to even get into gear). They were wrong. Fact: it was put into law within a few weeks of Labour getting into power.

Here's the info I found on the previous law:


I respect you integrity and transparency and willingness to be as open as you have.
 

slowworm

Full Member
May 8, 2008
2,183
1,110
Devon
So, and I don't mind being a test case here, any advice on how to proceed, or is it even worth it?​

It probably isn't worth the effort. But, from my limited understanding the 2019 amendment would only apply if you knife had violent words on it. The law says serrated edge and images or words.

(i)a cutting edge;
(ii)a serrated edge; and
(iii)images or words (whether on the blade or handle) that suggest that it is to be used for the purpose of violence.”


Did you get a receipt for the knife? If you have the time and energy it could be worth chasing it up and raising a complaint if you are sure the knife is legal. If you're a member of certain organisations they could help, BASC for example are providing advice to members.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: spokenword

spokenword

Tenderfoot
May 23, 2024
75
59
64
Surrey
I respect you integrity and transparency and willingness to be as open as you have.
Thanks. Just a lack of patience really, and that I hate government paperwork... and the idea of being arrested :)

But I do want to provide feedback so everyone knows what to expect when round two of even newer knife laws start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeeDee

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE