When was the pic taken, was it after they felled sections of the metal frames to enable access to search, how were the lifts held up, were there lifts that went down to the basement, have the credetials of that pile pic been tested.
Don't you think you're just being a tad pedantic with this insistance on names and credentials? Take a look at the photo HillBill posted above it's there in the centre of the pic. No I don't know the fireman, nor do Iknow his bloodgroup or shoe size...
And if this is the case those kind of things take ages to rig up.
There was nothing but time before the event "IF" it was an inside job, then there is no reason why it couldn't have been done.
So not only do facts and sound logical evidence fail to convince you but doubly bad (and frustrating to those of us that wish to make people like you aware of this sort of information) is that you then say you consider yourself a critic of government and do not readily believe in everything they say.
You are suffering from Orwellian "double-think" whereby you are simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs and you are not even consciously aware you are doing it!
To take an analogy from the classic movie, you are too deeply plugged in to the Matrix to be able to step out and even comprehend the pychological issues you are suffering from, but I will help you out and link you to a webpage that should make you aware of your predicament, oh but then again you don't want to wake up, do you? http://red-pill.org/why-wont-they-listen/
Nice quotes Mike and I see your point but don't you think those who instigated these crimes haven't looked back over history and learnt from the mistakes made previously by others? Never has America been more secretive than it is now. The freedoms they so proudly speak of are dribbled away like sand through an hourglass.
Perhaps the Bush administration and the CIA, or whatever blackhat subdivision of it, had some clever examples to follow...
...Herman Göring: "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."...
...I have never disputed planes didn't crash into the WTC towers, but bear this in mind if you have ever chopped down a tree you start chopping your way through until the remaining fibres weaken and the top pulls the rest of it over sideways. Both of those planes hit near the top ¼ of the tower. But the collapse failed at exactly the same time and fell directly downwards in almost free fall. The remaining UNDAMAGED building below it didn't even compress and throw off the top part sideways. Physics doesn't work that way. everything naturally follows the path of least resistance...
...WTC7 didn't have the luxury of a plane hitting it yet we're told raging fire roared inside hollowing out the core until the shell gave wave. I didn't see much smoke and I never knew office chairs and paper could burn so hot as to melt steel beams
...
So what's the motive?
Don't you think you're just being a tad pedantic with this insistance on names and credentials? Take a look at the photo HillBill posted above it's there in the centre of the pic. No I don't know the fireman, nor do Iknow his bloodgroup or shoe size.
(seems this thread hasn't run it's course after all)
edit found a better image:
Seems this is an entirely natural phemomenon as a result of collapse... even to the melting drips of molton metal. NOT!
1st point. If the idea was simply to create an illusion that the US had been attacked so as to make it easier to get public support for a war; then WHY go to all the trouble of a "controlled" collapse when it would have been oh so much easier to let the buildings topple over?
2nd point. As I recall the fires were fueled by the fuel oil/diesel fuel in the buildings emergency power generators.
Perhaps all the gold that was under the WTC? Simple robbery, destroy any evidence, buy lots of time before anyone notices its gone? With it being one of the worlds largest gold stores, its plausible. Especially for someone with the money/resources to pull it off.
They only found 220million worth of precious metals after the clean up, and that was under a building not hit or collapsed. Nothing came from under the buildings that collapsed.
They could have hit the towers with planes. Robbed em, dropped em, moved on to WTC 7 when everyone was looking at the main attraction, then dropped that when they were away.
Yes, its very elaborate, yes, its unlikely, but it IS possible.
Would you cut a piece of steel, that big, at such an angle so that the second the cut is complete the girder would come crashing down? No you wouldn't, no one would. It'd be as close to suicide as you could do. No, Acetylene cuts are made in such a way that the material being cut will not collapse on the cutter. Explosive residue was also found Chris.Having used burning gear to cut up a power station made with very heavy steel "I" beams,this photo looks exactly how an oxyacetylene torch cut looks.
So what's the motive?
Assuming for a moment that it's a possible motive then we have to go on to the practcallity of the plan. IF someone (or group) had the finacial resources to pull off such a scheme then they were/are obviously good businessmen (else they'd never have amassed said resources) So do you really believe that they'd spend $millions (including the payroll of thousands of co-conspirators) on a risk to gain possibly $400,000,000 that would then have to be fenced without creating suspicion and then split?
Yes it's possible. But as you said,very, very, very unlikely.
they aren't irrefutable though are they? you can't post a link with a bloke saying he found a girder cut diagonally then apply that to every girder in the building.
thermite is aluminium and iron oxide. absolutely no way there could be rust and aluminium in a building without it being thermite?
there is evidence for your theory but there's also evidence for the accepted theory because 2 socking great planes flew into those towers (not WTC 7 don't have an opinion on that as I haven't done any research)
if it was a government plot then I can't see it being done in such a half arsed manner. the CIA, NSA, FBI all have people paid just to think about this stuff there's no way they'd have missed the possibility that someone would find bits of it after (if it was done deliberately)
So they were transporting the gold out after the plane had hit? Gold is.heavy... So they need.some trucks, and possibly a forklift. A path through the traffic.. Oh and Jeremy Irons.....