The Titanic sinking conspiracy theory

Retired Member southey

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Jun 4, 2006
11,098
13
your house!
When was the pic taken, was it after they felled sections of the metal frames to enable access to search, how were the lifts held up, were there lifts that went down to the basement, have the credetials of that pile pic been tested.
 

santaman2000

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Jan 15, 2011
16,909
1,120
68
Florida
Don't you think you're just being a tad pedantic with this insistance on names and credentials? Take a look at the photo HillBill posted above it's there in the centre of the pic. No I don't know the fireman, nor do Iknow his bloodgroup or shoe size...

Without giving up the names of said witnesses we have absolutely no way to establish their credibility do we? They might be engineers trained by MIT or they might just as easily be the 3 Stooges.
 

mountainm

Bushcrafter through and through
Jan 12, 2011
9,990
12
Selby
www.mikemountain.co.uk
There was nothing but time before the event :) "IF" it was an inside job, then there is no reason why it couldn't have been done.

No you misunderstand - I said I could understand them doing a controlled (and hasty) demolition to stop the buidling falling in a wider footprint causing further damage. But I can't understand any other motive for demolishing the building with prior knowledge given planes hit them. It's not like it reinforces any terror.

So what's the motive?
 

wattsy

Native
Dec 10, 2009
1,111
3
Lincoln
So not only do facts and sound logical evidence fail to convince you but doubly bad (and frustrating to those of us that wish to make people like you aware of this sort of information) is that you then say you consider yourself a critic of government and do not readily believe in everything they say.

You are suffering from Orwellian "double-think" whereby you are simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs and you are not even consciously aware you are doing it!

To take an analogy from the classic movie, you are too deeply plugged in to the Matrix to be able to step out and even comprehend the pychological issues you are suffering from, but I will help you out and link you to a webpage that should make you aware of your predicament, oh but then again you don't want to wake up, do you? http://red-pill.org/why-wont-they-listen/

you're last 3 or 4 posts are the biggest load of cr£p I've ever read.

and I've read all of the Twilight Saga
 

santaman2000

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Jan 15, 2011
16,909
1,120
68
Florida
Nice quotes Mike and I see your point but don't you think those who instigated these crimes haven't looked back over history and learnt from the mistakes made previously by others? Never has America been more secretive than it is now. The freedoms they so proudly speak of are dribbled away like sand through an hourglass.
Perhaps the Bush administration and the CIA, or whatever blackhat subdivision of it, had some clever examples to follow...

...Herman Göring: "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists
for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."...

...I have never disputed planes didn't crash into the WTC towers, but bear this in mind if you have ever chopped down a tree you start chopping your way through until the remaining fibres weaken and the top pulls the rest of it over sideways. Both of those planes hit near the top ¼ of the tower. But the collapse failed at exactly the same time and fell directly downwards in almost free fall. The remaining UNDAMAGED building below it didn't even compress and throw off the top part sideways. Physics doesn't work that way. everything naturally follows the path of least resistance...

...WTC7 didn't have the luxury of a plane hitting it yet we're told raging fire roared inside hollowing out the core until the shell gave wave. I didn't see much smoke and I never knew office chairs and paper could burn so hot as to melt steel beams
...

1st point. If the idea was simply to create an illusion that the US had been attacked so as to make it easier to get public support for a war; then WHY go to all the trouble of a "controlled" collapse when it would have been oh so much easier to let the buildings topple over?

2nd point. As I recall the fires were fueled by the fuel oil/diesel fuel in the buildings emergency power generators.
 

HillBill

Bushcrafter through and through
Oct 1, 2008
8,165
159
W. Yorkshire
So what's the motive?

Perhaps all the gold that was under the WTC? Simple robbery, destroy any evidence, buy lots of time before anyone notices its gone? With it being one of the worlds largest gold stores, its plausible. Especially for someone with the money/resources to pull it off.

They only found 220million worth of precious metals after the clean up, and that was under a building not hit or collapsed. Nothing came from under the buildings that collapsed.

They could have hit the towers with planes. Robbed em, dropped em, moved on to WTC 7 when everyone was looking at the main attraction, then dropped that when they were away.

Yes, its very elaborate, yes, its unlikely, but it IS possible.
 

sapper1

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Feb 3, 2008
2,572
1
swansea
Don't you think you're just being a tad pedantic with this insistance on names and credentials? Take a look at the photo HillBill posted above it's there in the centre of the pic. No I don't know the fireman, nor do Iknow his bloodgroup or shoe size.

(seems this thread hasn't run it's course after all) :lurk:

edit found a better image:

cut3.jpg


Seems this is an entirely natural phemomenon as a result of collapse... even to the melting drips of molton metal. NOT!

Having used burning gear to cut up a power station made with very heavy steel "I" beams,this photo looks exactly how an oxyacetylene torch cut looks.
 

Biker

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
1st point. If the idea was simply to create an illusion that the US had been attacked so as to make it easier to get public support for a war; then WHY go to all the trouble of a "controlled" collapse when it would have been oh so much easier to let the buildings topple over?

2nd point. As I recall the fires were fueled by the fuel oil/diesel fuel in the buildings emergency power generators.

Point 1 even G.W.Bush and the black hats had some modicum of restraint. Plus Silverstien didn't has leases on all the property around the WTC.

Point 2 and this would have been suffucient to burn for hours and hours? Despite people still being in the building just prior to WTC7's collapse who got out to tell stories of bangs and explosive detonations. Had a deisel fire been raging on all floors surely they would have mentioned that too? yes there was fire, but not to the degree of inferno NIST portrayed in their simulations.
 

santaman2000

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Jan 15, 2011
16,909
1,120
68
Florida
Perhaps all the gold that was under the WTC? Simple robbery, destroy any evidence, buy lots of time before anyone notices its gone? With it being one of the worlds largest gold stores, its plausible. Especially for someone with the money/resources to pull it off.

They only found 220million worth of precious metals after the clean up, and that was under a building not hit or collapsed. Nothing came from under the buildings that collapsed.

They could have hit the towers with planes. Robbed em, dropped em, moved on to WTC 7 when everyone was looking at the main attraction, then dropped that when they were away.

Yes, its very elaborate, yes, its unlikely, but it IS possible.

Assuming for a moment that it's a possible motive then we have to go on to the practcallity of the plan. IF someone (or group) had the finacial resources to pull off such a scheme then they were/are obviously good businessmen (else they'd never have amassed said resources) So do you really believe that they'd spend $millions (including the payroll of thousands of co-conspirators) on a risk to gain possibly $400,000,000 that would then have to be fenced without creating suspicion and then split?

Yes it's possible. But as you said,very, very, very unlikely.
 

HillBill

Bushcrafter through and through
Oct 1, 2008
8,165
159
W. Yorkshire
Having used burning gear to cut up a power station made with very heavy steel "I" beams,this photo looks exactly how an oxyacetylene torch cut looks.
Would you cut a piece of steel, that big, at such an angle so that the second the cut is complete the girder would come crashing down? No you wouldn't, no one would. It'd be as close to suicide as you could do. No, Acetylene cuts are made in such a way that the material being cut will not collapse on the cutter. Explosive residue was also found Chris. :)
 

Biker

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
So what's the motive?

Larry Silverstein bought the lease for the buildings in July 2001 knowing they had to have a total refit and what asbestos was in there removed. Demolition would have cost BILLIONS. So it was insured to the hilt, which also included collapse through act of terrorism. Post 9/11 he filed for two seperate independant attacks on his property and won a nice fat bonus out of it as a result. he got his buildings removed and some nice fat real estate to play with after the rubble had gone.*

What's the motive? Bottom line - Money.

Pathetic eh?


*This is just a small in a nutshell description of what happened
 

HillBill

Bushcrafter through and through
Oct 1, 2008
8,165
159
W. Yorkshire
What makes you think thousands were involved? I presume thats an assumption?

Less than a hundred tops i'd say.

It'd explain the governments sketchy stories. They didn't want the embarrassment of it happing on their soil under their noses etc?

$400 million in one of the worlds largest gold stores? No were talking billions rather than millions. There are 2 other gold stores in america with billions if not trillions in gold in them. I cant see there being such a low amount there. Kuwaits gold was there, bet that added up to more than a few billion.


Assuming for a moment that it's a possible motive then we have to go on to the practcallity of the plan. IF someone (or group) had the finacial resources to pull off such a scheme then they were/are obviously good businessmen (else they'd never have amassed said resources) So do you really believe that they'd spend $millions (including the payroll of thousands of co-conspirators) on a risk to gain possibly $400,000,000 that would then have to be fenced without creating suspicion and then split?

Yes it's possible. But as you said,very, very, very unlikely.
 

Grooveski

Native
Aug 9, 2005
1,707
10
54
Glasgow
Just thought I'd pop up a link to the lunar surface journal website.
....for no other reason than I think it's a pretty interesting site and have lost myself in there for many hours in the past.
It's all in there(somewhere, lol) Flight plans, Van-Allan analysis, camera details, maps of the landing sites. There's hours(maybe days) of video scattered throughout, every photo taken on the missions, details of the experiments performed.....

...it goes on - it really does. :)

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/frame.html

Sorry if it's already been posted. I can't claim to have read the whole thread but I get the idea.
Better to study the material yourself rather than just what the theorists have cherry-picked and laid out in whatever order suits their argument.

Oh, and Titanic theorists may be interested in "Titanic: The ship that didn't sink" by Robin Gardiner. Was written back in the eighties and is where all the "facts" in yon documentary first came from. Can't really recommend it, wasn't very convincing, was full of "Wouldn't it be more likely that....[insert some theory made up on the spot]" comments. :rolleyes:
 

mountainm

Bushcrafter through and through
Jan 12, 2011
9,990
12
Selby
www.mikemountain.co.uk
So they were transporting the gold out after the plane had hit? Gold is.heavy... So they need.some trucks, and possibly a forklift. A path through the traffic.. Oh and Jeremy Irons.....
 

HillBill

Bushcrafter through and through
Oct 1, 2008
8,165
159
W. Yorkshire
Finding evidence of thermite is different than just finding evidence of the materials used to make it. For example, iron and carbon make steel. Yet steel is always described as steel, not its base materials. Same with thermite. We have the technology to identify the material.

I don't think its a government plot, i think it goes beyond government. :)

Oh BTW if you watch that RT vid i put up, it says evidence of standard explosive was found too.


they aren't irrefutable though are they? you can't post a link with a bloke saying he found a girder cut diagonally then apply that to every girder in the building.
thermite is aluminium and iron oxide. absolutely no way there could be rust and aluminium in a building without it being thermite?
there is evidence for your theory but there's also evidence for the accepted theory because 2 socking great planes flew into those towers (not WTC 7 don't have an opinion on that as I haven't done any research)

if it was a government plot then I can't see it being done in such a half arsed manner. the CIA, NSA, FBI all have people paid just to think about this stuff there's no way they'd have missed the possibility that someone would find bits of it after (if it was done deliberately)
 
Last edited:

HillBill

Bushcrafter through and through
Oct 1, 2008
8,165
159
W. Yorkshire
Fire engines with the water tanks removed would be my choice to do just that. There would have been fork lifts on site anyway.

So they were transporting the gold out after the plane had hit? Gold is.heavy... So they need.some trucks, and possibly a forklift. A path through the traffic.. Oh and Jeremy Irons.....
 

mountainm

Bushcrafter through and through
Jan 12, 2011
9,990
12
Selby
www.mikemountain.co.uk
Lets say gold is worth about 25678.80US per KG back then

so $400,000,000= 15,578 Kg of gold (approx)

15 tons of gold

I take this out from a building I know has been hit by a plane?


A US fire engine can carry just under 3.8 metric tons of water.

4 fire engines. Plus time to load them up and ship 'em out.
 
Last edited:

HillBill

Bushcrafter through and through
Oct 1, 2008
8,165
159
W. Yorkshire
15 tons could be carried in 10 fire trucks easily, less perhaps, and would only take 10 minutes to load if it was palletised with a FLT. The figures seem high, but loading and transporting gold to that weight would be easy and quick. Due to the density of gold it wouldnt take up much space. Firetrucks are designed to cope with carrying heavy loads ( water)

That bit is very possible. A few dead guards wouldn't be a worry either after the collapse. plus fire trucks were going in and out of the WTC basement all morning and some were still there when the rubble had been cleared.
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE