Well...just to see where things stand I called Chris Reeve Knives a few minutes ago. From what I gather from the receptionist they are not too concerned with Schrade's production of a similar knife as there is nothing illegal about producing a knife similar to someone else's it happens all the time, and since they are often just cheap knock-offs and pieces of crap (which by the way I do not think this one is) it often has the effect of illustrating the quality of the original. Schrade does make it obvious that it is not a Chris Reeve knife by proudly displaying the Schrade name in big bold letters, and they changed the handle design enough that any true Chris Reeve fan or collector will note the differences. Though she was a bit guarded about exactly what she said and chose her words carefully... I got the feeling they were somewhat flattered by it and not threatened by it at all. However I did learn that there are some knives out there that look identical to the Chris Reeve knives that bear a false Chris Reeve logo and they do have a major problem with that of course and have people looking into it.
In all of this not once have I said this knife is equal in quality to the Chris Reeve knife. I'm pretty sure that it is not made of A-2 tool steel (all the Schrade site says is "hi-carbon steel") as are the CRK's, and I know that it is produced in the R.O.C. which has not historically been known for the production of high quality blades...in fact, I think, quite the opposite. What I have said is that the lines are good...other than the serrations are a little flawed (something that will likely never happen with a C.R.), it is not sloppily made, the machining is very well executed with plenty of meat left where the blade meets the handle, it feels good and solid and after whittling some points, chopping down some dead limbs, hacking through some hardwood limbs bigger than my wrist or more than 10 cm in diameter, being used as a pry bar to pry apart sections of a fatwood stump, and hacking on some very dense fatwood for a bit it still has it's original shape and it still shaves. This in and of it's self hasn't impressed me as I have done the same thing more times than I can remember as well as some pretty serious batoning with a couple of Ka-Bar designs, my issue survival knife, and my SOG bowie, with no ill effects on them at all and them still shave afterward. However I have also performed the same tests with an Ontario SP-6 that did show signs of wear immediately afterward, had a bent tip, and would hardly shave, and other import knives that utterly failed. What I have said is that it is based on a proven design, that it has held up very well so far and is by far not the worst knife I've ever bought as I have paid more for domestic knives that didn't hold up this well, and that it is quite likely worth the asking price.