Actually I suspect most US hospitals are over reporting. They have a financial incentive as they get more funds allocated for covid deaths.BTW there's different reporting criteria in different countries. USA has a lower death per 100,000 people than Belgium but they only record COVID deaths that the patient had a positive test for. Belgium record death as COVID if there's any possibility it was a factor. They prefer to capture every case even if that puts the error in the death figure towards the over estimation side. USA is under recording. Funnily enough there's a big suspicion Russia is doing the same with especial doubt on st Petersburg figures.
Which is better, over recording or under recording? It's not important for actual containment because they'll sterilise every room between patients no matter what caused the death. It's only important for statistics and decisions made using those statistics.
Well you might be right but in an article in a local paper to the UK explained the higher figure for Belgium Vs USA figure using the guidelines of their own government agencies that's recording these things. Apparently it's clear in those guidelines that USA is taking a less strict method of determining COVID deaths. Can't remember the source but I think it was the guardian (I understand the version of their website is different if you're based in USA so if it was them you might need to mask your location to see it).Actually I suspect most US hospitals are over reporting. They have a financial incentive as they get more funds allocated for covid deaths.
Who knows? The reality is the US doesn’t report at all as such. Florida reports. Alabama reports. New York reports. California reports. Etc. Etc. Etc. And each state has its own criteria and bias. All the federal government does is collect those reports. That said, I’ve mostly seen deaths attributed to Covid simply because they can and as I said, extra government funds are allocated for higher coved counts.Well you might be right but in an article in a local paper to the UK explained the higher figure for Belgium Vs USA figure using the guidelines of their own government agencies that's recording these things. Apparently it's clear in those guidelines that USA is taking a less strict method of determining COVID deaths. Can't remember the source but I think it was the guardian (I understand the version of their website is different if you're based in USA so if it was them you might need to mask your location to see it).
Of course is a matter of interpretation return USA and Belgium but with Russia is simply fraud I reckon. That's my bias though, or is it???
I suspect you’re close, but it’s more complex than Trump. Without him the politics would still play out. Remember the governor of each state (as well as the law enforcement) is answerable to the voters every election cycle. And in most states so are the judges and indeed, the coroners.I suppose honesty in reporting could be a political matter. Over reporting if against Trumpian policies, under reporting if they need trump support. A red Vs blue matter perhaps????
We're you in hospital with it stew?
Disappointedly I'm only being offered the IgG test and not the combined IgG/IgM test - its better than nothing but I'm
not sure why - nor why there will be a several week delay while they validate the test? particularly when Stew's had his
This whole plan seems like too many cooks to me...
especially when the government without warning changes the plan - surgical masks for all NHS works and patients - that'll last as long as the masks to - and I be that won't be a week
Whole blood donation?
Only certain people are being offered the test there? I’ve passed several drive through testing stations here. In the far western Panhandle alone. I haven’t felt the need to get it done though so I don’t know how long before results are back here.