Sporks are next to useless.
I'd usually agree but this one seriously impressed a woman i was hoping to make a nice impression on, it has been the most useful spork i've ever seen
Sporks are next to useless.
Nice carving and thanks for the info that nut allergy also applies to the wood, I wasn't aware of that.
Walnut wood and several other woods have small amounts of juglone, but much lower amounts than other plant parts, for example nuts, bark, and roots. The potential for toxicity should be minimal in cutting boards, which are dried. Juglone is not very soluble in water, so I would not expect it to come out of cutting boards and into food very easily. I would think that the concern for toxicity from this source would be minimal, but again, we have not done any direct research and I am not aware of any specifically on this topic. However, if you are cutting the wood and there is sawdust, then protection from the sawdust is in order.
You are using the wrong ones, then.
I grew up with the original sporks - by splayd. They were proper stainless dining cutlery. A 'spork' should NEVER include a knife blade.
I did have a titanium modern spork, it was an ok spook and an ok fork. An excellent eating tool for stew, risotto and curry.
Not a good eating implement for bacon, steak etc.
Nothing wrong with a good Spork if it is carved right, I have carved two now and both times I have found out more about cuts and techniques and how many people actually dislike them. Nice Spork by the way.
I wanted to make a double ender just for the extra carving work involved but my lady friend requested what she referred to as a traditional spork
This diagram may help those confused by cutlery crossbreeds
Aye, chopsticks and soup - it's a braw bird the puddock......
Mind, I suppose you could pick out the bits and drink the rest?