As opposed to keeping 19 chickens in one square metre?
Yes I see your point. Its the hunting for entertainment I feel would be shameful. I agree farmers are being paid to give us the meat.
As opposed to keeping 19 chickens in one square metre?
But...beautiful woodlands are preserved as "cover" for game birds. These are all eaten but the shooters (tossers to a man) shoot mainly for sport - at a cost of >£1,000 per gun, per day. Raptors, deer, badger, fox, weasels and others get to live in these woods too. I get the immense privilege on living on such an estate.
The owner has told me that, as soon as the shooting stops, he clear fells the trees for timber, grubs out the roots and plants a cash crop. He has to make a living after all.
Is that what we want?
Not me - they preserve beautiful natural landscapes with their sport. As fishemen do the rivers. Not my bag but damn it all I will fight tooth and nail to prevent another farm going under and having to grow mono culture arable crops for PC tree huggers. The result of such growth is more woodland removed and more habitat destroyed.
Red
So your choices are:
Game shooting (with woodland)
or entire woodland ripped out and wheat fields.
This is the very real choice faced by this farm (50 or so miles from you)
Vote now.............
Blimey Rob, what a great post!oh and also
Red... just out of interest
what are your views on trophy hunting in general?
is there any way i can help stop factory farms?
apart from buying free range eggs?
Okay answer one. Trophy hunting is...not black and white.
A great example is..big game. There are over populations of "big 5" animals in game reserves.
Now here are two choices.
One - rangers "cull" herds. This depletes old males and controls herds.
Poor starving people will still hunt elephants for ivory with AK47s of course.
Or you can let some rich pillock hunt the animals to be culled.
This lets them take a trophy. It also encourages the local population to protect those "trophy" animals as they are woth far more as trophies than they are are on the black market for ivory. Literally poachers become gamekeepers.
IF the money is ploughed into the local economy and the value of protecting game is directly reflected into the provision of food, schools and healthcare, (as well as species protection) then its fine in my book
Red
oh no... i meen, we keep chickens as it is they are free to run about in the garden all they want...
what im thinking about is helping stop factory farming
because its pretty much impossiable... right?
Well I suppose you could try to affect legislation and regulations, try to cause a sea-change in public opinion and remove the market for intensively-produced food, get stinking rich and buy all such farms and shut them down, or join a terrorist organisation that claims it's interested in animal welfare. I don't recommend the latter and the rest are far from likely to succeed.
Unfortunately there are some things we don't like that we just have to live with.
I'm not a deer hunter, but I have heard of Albino's being left in Scottish herds to make the herd easier to spot from a distance on the hills.isn't the Albino deer gene a negetive and if managing the estate correctly be the most likely choice to cull first?
(correct me if i'm mistaken)