With issues like this it would be useful to read a non biased viewpoint. Down here for example the moors, cliff tops and other areas are burnt by charities for the benefit of nature. I've even had to complain to the managers of a nearby nature reserve due to inappropriate burning.So while the 'plebs' are banned from enjoying a campfire the real cause of wildfires still goes unchecked by the same Scottish Government.
I can also sympathise with the reluctance for having to apply for a licence. Having been forced to apply for a felling licence and spending a fair bit of time and money on the application and chasing only for me to wait for years for any outcome I think many of these government agencies are not fit for purpose.
My main question though is about the increased risk of devastating fires caused by the lack of controlled burning. I.e. you hear now that some of the big wild fires are being blamed on the amount of material built up over the years as the land use has changed and the scrub hasn't been cut back or burnt off more regularly.