falling rain said:although a fish (2 hours depending on size) and a rabbit roughly the same I'd say.
Bushcraft4life said:No a rabbit would take a bit longer than fish as meat takes longer to cook. For something small like a rabbit you would have to wrap it up in burdock leaves first because otherwise the meat would shrink if you used bare rocks and no coverage. For something such as deer or wild boar preparation is a must otherwise you may end up cooking it for hours and finding it is no where near done .
Deer is best cooked in parts such as pit oven cooking the legs and then smoking the rest of the meat into jerky. If anyone watched ray mears wild food (repeated tonight at 7 tonight) then he does exactly this. And he gives some great tips on how to construct the oven.
Hope this helps.
bambodoggy said:Are you talking from experience here matey? As I've had no experience of rabit shrinking any less when wrapped than when just put in. As far as I know all meat shrinks when cooked, that's why restaurants give steak weights before cooking on the menu . The difference to my mind and from my experience is that if you wrap the meat then you do not have to bother weaving the top layer to keep the sand/soil out of your food but if you don't wrap than you either make a woven grass/reed etc matt or eat gritty food.
There's also going to be far more meat on a rabbit sized salmon than on the rabbit so although fish may cook faster they may have about the same cooking time.
Cheers,
Bam.
Bushcraft4life said:Yep i am dude . I have found in my experience for the short amount of time i have had it , that the hot rock touching directly the meat can cause a bit of shrinking. As for the bit about meat taking longer to cook than fish. Give me a break guys i said ''a bit'' .