Nanok performance vs endurance

[Bjorn Victor]

Hello there,

A quick one:

Is there a difference in filling between a Performance -10°C and an Endurance SF -10°C by Nanok? I know the colour, the 2 zips and the boot bucket is different, but is that the only thing? What makes the weight so different (2340g for the SF vs 1870/1970g for the performance)? Is the temp rating equally reliable for the 2 bags?

Also: if the filling is the same, why does everyone go for the heavy one?

Thanks and sorry to bring up Nanok again...

PS: anyone want to swap a Nanok bag for a Gregory backpack, a gore tex bivvy or an Outdoor Research Alpine Awning tarp (or a combination) (see swap shop) ?

Bjorn

 

[Wayland]

It's because we all have a green fetish.....

Seriously though, the weight diference is down to the extra zip (which is handy if you're getting into a hammock.) and the boot bag which you can take or leave.