I first got an interest in 'living off the land' as I called it after watching a report on Nationwide when one of their presenters tried to survive on a Scottish island for a week and I subsequently discovered Food for Free.
I was thinking of joining the TA (having always had a fascination with the history of WWII) but went to University and joined the OTC. This was a fantastic experience - playing at soldiers without any real responsibility - and it worked like a charm on me and got me to apply for a commission.
I enjoyed Sandhurst and RSME Chatham /Chattenden but then got posted to 36 Engr Regt at Maidstone just after the end of the Falklands. The troop I took command of had been on the Sir Galahad when it was sunk and had lost two men killed and quite a number badly burned. I never really saw much of the men, as the Squadron was now on course support (providing help for the various courses being run at the RSME), nobody gave me any guidance on what I should be doing, and I was bored out of my mind. It may sound naive, but I didn't feel worthy as a junior officer straight out of training to command these men who had been in the thick of what was probably the last war of the British Empire. I was also very lonely - most nights I was in the officers' mess all by myself with nobody I could talk to.
With hindsight, I should have taken the initiative to try and sort things out (but maybe that's why I wasn't cut out to be an officer) and I asked for permission to resign my commission. Even at this stage, none of the senior officers tried to improve things for me and I left after two years service. The best they could suggest was a transfer to the Education Corps - but I wanted to be a Royal Engineer.
I was devastated that it hadn't worked out for me - I remember crying my eyes out as I walked away from my farewell dinner on my last night in the Army and have thought about it many times over with the benefit of hindsight - about how I could have made it work. I have met more than one officer since whose troop sergeant took the new officers by the scruff of the neck and taught them everything that the men did - from Sapper to Recce Sergeant. I just wish that someone had taken me under their wing in the same way.
Anyway...it's sometimes good to open up about these things as it has been hidden inside me for the last 25 years or so. I was, and still am, incredibly proud that I managed to get a commission and do look back on some of my time in the REs with fondness, but with the passage of time leaving was probably the right thing for me.
I still think that military kit is good - though this is a rather blind faith that because it is for the Army, it must be good. However, I personally avoid looking military when doing bushcraft as I don't want to look like a 'weekend warrior' - I want to look like a civilian, though I generally buy subdued colours (darker greens, blues). I do like to use some military kit, I like the idea of using a Millbank bag that was made in 1945.
My bushcraft is not the hard military style survival, it is more the philosophy of trying to live comfortably using, but not abusing, natural resources - something in the style of the stone age /american indian philosophies.
Anyway...sob story over. Not sure what I'm going to vote for as I agree with at least two of the options. I think that conflict has (for better or worse) had a tremendous impact on the development of 'civilisation' and much of the bushcraft technique must have been developed by Orde Wingate and the Chindits, among others (and my non-related namesake 'Mad' Mike Calvert). Equally, I currently would acknowledge a connection but avoid looking military.
Geoff